ReviewFrontiers of medicine2015
Three-dimensional reconstruction of light microscopy image sections: present and future.
Review in Frontiers of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transport of Nanoparticles into Plants and Their Detection Methods.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Three-dimensional visualization of Hertwig's epithelial root sheath during tooth root development with the miniTESOS tissue clearing method.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional cellular visualization in mouse apical periodontitis using combined whole-mount staining and optical tissue clearing.Journal of oral biosciences · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Neurovascular Network in Whole Mount Preparations and Thick-Cut Transverse Sections of Mouse Urinary Bladder.The world journal of men's health · 2021Article
- An enhanced staining method K-B-2R staining for three-dimensional nerve reconstruction.BMC neuroscience · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of tissue reconstruction algorithms for 3D histology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- A novel imaging method for correlating 2D light microscopic data and 3D volume data based on block-face imaging.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Understanding the three-dimensional world from two-dimensional immunofluorescent adjacent sections.Journal of pathology informatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction technologies can reveal previously hidden microstructures in human tissue. However, the lack of ideal, non-destructive cross-sectional imaging techniques is still a problem. Despite some drawbacks, histological sectioning remains one of the most powerful methods for accurate high-resolution representation of tissue structures. Computer technologies can produce 3D representations of interesting human tissue and organs that have been serial-sectioned, dyed or stained, imaged, and segmented for 3D visualization. 3D reconstruction also has great potential in the fields of tissue engineering and 3D printing. This article outlines the most common methods for 3D tissue section reconstruction. We describe the most important academic concepts in this field, and provide critical explanations and comparisons. We also note key steps in the reconstruction procedures, and highlight recent progress in the development of new reconstruction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24952302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.