Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24951804›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Development of two molecular approaches for differentiation of clinically relevant yeast species closely related to Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata.

Xiaobo Feng, Jingsong Wu, Bo Ling, Xianwei Yang, Wanqing Liao, Weihua Pan, Zhirong Yao

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The first rare case ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaobo FengMedical Mycology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jingsong WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Bo LingMedical Mycology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xianwei YangMedical Mycology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wanqing LiaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Mycology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Weihua PanShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Mycology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China panweihua@medmail.com.cn dermatology.yao@sohu.com.
Zhirong YaoMedical Mycology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China panweihua@medmail.com.cn dermatology.yao@sohu.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging pathogens Candida palmioleophila, Candida fermentati, and Debaryomyces nepalensis are often misidentified as Candida guilliermondii or Candida famata in the clinical laboratory. Due to the significant differences in antifungal susceptibilities and epidemiologies among these closely related species, a lot of studies have focused on the identification of these emerging yeast species in clinical specimens. Nevertheless, limited tools are currently available for their discrimination. Here, two new molecular approaches were established to distinguish these closely related species. The first approach differentiates these species by use of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of partial internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) and large subunit ribosomal DNA with the enzymes BsaHI and XbaI in a double digestion. The second method involves a multiplex PCR based on the intron size differences of RPL18, a gene coding for a protein component of the large (60S) ribosomal subunit, and species-specific amplification. These two methods worked well in differentiation of these closely related yeast species and have the potential to serve as effective molecular tools suitable for laboratory diagnoses and epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungal ProteinsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycosesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, RibosomalSaccharomycetalesDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungal ProteinsRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 26S

Identifiers

PMID24951804
PMCPMC4313136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.