Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24951610›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2014

Estimates of young breast cancer survivors at risk for infertility in the U.S.

Katrina F Trivers, Aliza K Fink, Ann H Partridge, Kutluk Oktay, Elizabeth S Ginsburg, Chunyu Li, Lori A Pollack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in young patients with TClinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Breast cancer: an update on treatment-related infertility.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  15. Chemotherapy Associated Ovarian Failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Breast cancer treatment costs in younger, privately insured women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katrina F TriversDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA fph1@cdc.gov.
Aliza K FinkDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Ann H PartridgeDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Kutluk OktayDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Elizabeth S GinsburgDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Chunyu LiDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Lori A PollackDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ICF International, Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Molecular Reproduction, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation, New York, New York, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USFoundation for Child Development · USICF International (United States) · US

Funding

Characterization & Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Damage to Ovarian ReserveR01HD053112 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTLUK H OKTAY · 2007 to 2026
$7.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053112PHS HHS 200-2008-27957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatments for breast cancer can impair fertility. It is unknown how many U.S. survivors are at risk for infertility. We estimated the population at risk for infertility secondary to treatment among reproductive-aged breast cancer survivors.

methodsWe combined data from three sources: the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data on incident breast cancers diagnosed in women aged 15-44 years between 2004 and 2006; treatment data from NPCR's 2004 Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care (PoC) study; and data on women's intentions to have children from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).

resultsIn the cancer registry data, an average of 20,308 women with breast cancer aged <45 years were diagnosed annually. Based on estimates from PoC data, almost all of these survivors (97%, 19,416 women) were hormone receptor positive or received chemotherapy and would be at risk for infertility. These women need information about the impact of treatments on fertility. Estimates based on NSFG data suggest approximately half of these survivors (9,569 women) might want children and could benefit from fertility counseling and fertility preservation.

conclusionNearly all young breast cancer survivors in the U.S. are at risk for infertility. Physicians should discuss the potential impact of treatment on fertility. A smaller but sizeable number of at-risk survivors may be interested in having children. Given the magnitude of potential infertility and its quality-of-life implications, these survivors should have access to and potential coverage for fertility services.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleSurvivorsUnited StatesBreast neoplasmsFertility preservationInfertilityPregnancyReproductive behaviorSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID24951610
PMCPMC4122477
OpenAlexW2098560660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.