Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24951460›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2014

Withdrawal of ventilatory support outside the intensive care unit: guidance for practice.

Joanna Laddie, Finella Craig, Joe Brierley, Paula Kelly, Myra Bluebond-Langner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pediatric Critical Care Transport as a Conduit to Terminal Extubation at Home: A Case Series.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna LaddieEvelina London Children's Hospital, Guys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Finella CraigThe Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joe BrierleyGreat Ormond Street Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-6882
Paula KellyThe Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, University College London, Institute of Child Health and Lecturer in Child and Adolescent Nursing, Kings College London, London, UK.
Myra Bluebond-LangnerThe Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, UK Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBEvelina London Children's Healthcare · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the work of one tertiary paediatric palliative care service in facilitating planned withdrawal of ventilatory support outside the intensive care setting, with the purpose of developing local guidance for practice.

methodsRetrospective 10-year (2003-2012) case note review of intensive care patients whose parents elected to withdraw ventilation in another setting. Demographic and clinical data revealed common themes and specific incidents relevant to local guideline development.

results18 children (aged 2 weeks to 16 years) were considered. Three died prior to transfer. Transfer locations included home (5), hospice (8) and other (2). Primary pathologies included malignant, neurological, renal and respiratory diseases. Collaborative working was evidenced in the review including multidisciplinary team meetings with the palliative care team prior to discharge. Planning included development of symptom management plans and emergency care plans in the event of longer than anticipated survival. Transfer of children and management of extubations demonstrated the benefits of planning and recognition that unexpected events occur despite detailed planning. We identified the need for local written guidance supporting healthcare professionals planning and undertaking extubation outside the intensive care setting, addressing the following phases: (i) introduction of withdrawal, (ii) preparation pretransfer, (iii) extubation, (iv) care postextubation and (v) care postdeath.

conclusionsPlanned withdrawal of ventilatory support outside the intensive care setting is challenging and resource intensive. The development of local collaborations and guidance can enable parents of children dependent on intensive care to consider a preferred place of death for their child, which may be outside the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

Resuscitation OrdersAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePalliative CarePractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesVentilators, MechanicalGuildlinesPaediatric Intensive Care (PICU)Palliative CarePlace of Death

Identifiers

PMID24951460
PMCPMC4145452
OpenAlexW2132301466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.