Trial reportAnnals of hematology2014
Azacitidine in 302 patients with WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Austrian Azacitidine Registry of the AGMT-Study Group.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Registry on Hypomethylating Agents in Myeloid Neoplasms, Including Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Austrian Myeloid Registry
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Azacitidine in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Data from Prospective Studies.The oncologist · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Pracinostat plus azacitidine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study.Blood advances · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A phase I and pharmacodynamic study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat plus azacitidine in advanced myeloid neoplasia.Investigational new drugs · 2015Trial
- Intensive Versus Non-Intensive Therapy in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- An Update Comprehensive Review on Epigenetic Modifications and Therapies in Autoimmune Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Cytosine analogues as DNA methyltransferase substrates.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Real-World Outcome and Prognostic Factors in MDS Patients Treated with Azacitidine-A Retrospective Analysis.Cancers · 2024Article
- Spectrum of infections in different regimens of post-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (Heliyon · 2024Article
- Hypomethylating agent-based therapies in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia - A joint review by the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Trainee Committee.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical Utility of Azacitidine in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update on Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes.Cancer management and research · 2022Review
- Resistance to venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Predictive factors for response and survival in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hypomethylating agents: a real-life experience.Annals of hematology · 2020Article
- Low-intensity regimensTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2020Review
- [Diagnosis and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia : The updated 2018 Onkopedia Guideline].Der Internist · 2019Article
- Next Generation Sequencing in AML-On the Way to Becoming a New Standard for Treatment Initiation and/or Modulation?Cancers · 2019Review
- Extended dosing with CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with myeloid malignancies.American journal of hematology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data on efficacy and safety of azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with >30 % bone marrow (BM) blasts are limited, and the drug can only be used off-label in these patients. We previously reported on the efficacy and safety of azacitidine in 155 AML patients treated within the Austrian Azacitidine Registry (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01595295). We herein update this report with a population almost twice as large (n = 302). This cohort included 172 patients with >30 % BM blasts; 93 % would have been excluded from the pivotal AZA-001 trial (which led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval of azacitidine for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML with 20-30 % BM blasts). Despite this much more unfavorable profile, results are encouraging: overall response rate was 48 % in the total cohort and 72 % in patients evaluable according to MDS-IWG-2006 response criteria, respectively. Median OS was 9.6 (95 % CI 8.53-10.7) months. A clinically relevant OS benefit was observed with any form of disease stabilization (marrow stable disease (8.1 months), hematologic improvement (HI) (9.7 months), or the combination thereof (18.9 months)), as compared to patients without response and/or without disease stabilization (3.2 months). Age, white blood cell count, and BM blast count at start of therapy did not influence OS. The baseline factors LDH >225 U/l, ECOG ≥2, comorbidities ≥3, monosomal karyotype, and prior disease-modifying drugs, as well as the response-related factors hematologic improvement and further deepening of response after first response, were significant independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis. Azacitidine seems effective in WHO-AML, including patients with >30 % BM blasts (currently off-label use). Although currently not regarded as standard form of response assessment in AML, disease stabilization and/or HI should be considered sufficient response to continue treatment with azacitidine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.