ArticleIrish journal of medical science2015
Urinary nerve growth factor in patients with detrusor overactivity.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetrusor overactivity (DO) is one of the most frequent bladder dysfunctions in children up to the age of 18. Nowadays, the only way to confirm DO is by urodynamic investigation, which is an invasive procedure. Among the many mediators influencing bladder function, nerve growth factor (NGF) plays an important role. The present study was designed to measure urinary NGF (uNGF) levels in patients with DO diagnosed by urodynamic study in comparison with healthy controls.
methodsThe investigation was conducted on 44 children, divided into two groups (24 patients with DO, 20 healthy children). Uroflowmetry was performed in all enrolled to the study and cystometry only to patients. uNGF levels were estimated in both studied groups.
resultsThe median uNGF level in patients with DO before treatment was higher compared with healthy controls. There were no differences between uNGF levels in patients after anticholinergic treatment and the controls. We found differences in uroflowmetry parameters between the reference group and the patients. We found correlations between uroflowmetry parameters and uNGF/cr. level.
conclusions1. The uNGF level could be used for detecting DO in children and adolescents. 2. Measuring uNGF level is a simple, noninvasive procedure and very useful for choosing therapy in patients with DO in various clinical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.