ArticleBMC genomics2014
Identification, characterization, and utilization of single copy genes in 29 angiosperm genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Expectations of duplicate gene retention under the gene duplicability hypothesis.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Optimizing an efficient ensemble approach for high-quality de novo transcriptome assembly of Thymus daenensis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Synteny Identifies Reliable Orthologs for Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomics of the Brassicaceae.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative phylogenomic and structural analysis of canonical secretory PLA2 and novel PLA2-like family in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Codon usage bias and dinucleotide preference in 29 Drosophila species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Functional and evolutionary analysis of the Arabidopsis 4R-MYB protein SNAPc4 as part of the SNAP complex.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Quantification of Actaea racemosa L. (black cohosh) from some of its potential adulterants using qPCR and dPCR methods.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A transcriptome-based study on the phylogeny and evolution of the taxonomically controversial subfamily Apioideae (Apiaceae).Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Identification of a molecular marker associated with lignotuber in Eucalyptus ssp.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Assembly of the 373k gene space of the polyploid sugarcane genome reveals reservoirs of functional diversity in the world's leading biomass crop.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Identification and assessment of variable single-copy orthologous (SCO) nuclear loci for low-level phylogenomics: a case study in the genus Rosa (Rosaceae).BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Review
- UGT74S1 is the key player in controlling secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) formation in flax.BMC plant biology · 2017Article
- Gene Duplicability of Core Genes Is Highly Consistent across All Angiosperms.The Plant cell · 2016Article
- A genome-scale mining strategy for recovering novel rapidly-evolving nuclear single-copy genes for addressing shallow-scale phylogenetics in Hydrangea.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Single-copy gene based 50 K SNP chip for genetic studies and molecular breeding in rice.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Genomics and Evolution in Traditional Medicinal Plants: Road to a Healthier Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle copy genes are common across angiosperm genomes. With the sufficiently high quality sequenced genomes, the identification of large-scale single copy genes among multiple species is possible. Although some characteristics have been reported, our study provides novel insights into single copy genes.
resultsWe identified single copy genes across 29 angiosperm genomes. A significant negative correlation was found between the number of duplicate blocks and the number of single copy genes. We found that a considerable number of single copy genes are located in organelles, showing a preference for binding and catalytic activity. The analysis of effective number of codons (Nc) illustrates that single copy genes have a stronger codon bias than non-single copy genes in eudicots. The relative high expression level of single copy genes was partially confirmed by the RNA-seq data, rather than the Codon Adaptation Index (CAI). Unlike in most other species, a strongly negatively correlation occurs between Nc and GC3 among single copy genes in grass genomes. When compared to all non-single copy genes, single copy genes indicate more conservation (as indicated by Ka and Ks values). But our alternative splicing (AS) results reveal that selective constraints are weaker in single copy genes than in low copy family genes (1-10 in-paralogs) and stronger than high copy family genes (>10 in-paralogs). Using concatenated shared single copy genes, we obtained a well-resolved phylogenetic tree. With the addition of intron sequences, the branch support is improved, but striking incongruences are also evident. Therefore, it is noteworthy that inclusion of intron sequences seems more appropriate for the phylogenetic reconstruction at lower taxonomic levels.
conclusionsOur analysis provides insight into the evolutionary characteristics of single copy genes across 29 angiosperm genomes. The results suggest that there are key differences in evolutionary constraints between single copy genes and non-single copy genes. And to some extent, these evolutionary constraints show some species-specific differences, especially between eudicots and monocots. Our preliminary evidence also suggests that the concatenated shared single copy genes are well suited for use in resolving phylogenetic relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.