ArticleGenetics2014
A C++ template library for efficient forward-time population genetic simulation of large populations.
Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- The rights and wrongs of rescaling in population genetics simulations.PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Accessible, Realistic Genome Simulation with Selection Using stdpopsim.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Accessible, realistic genome simulation with selection using stdpopsim.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Parameter Scaling in Population Genetics Simulations may Introduce Unintended Background Selection: Considerations for Scaled Simulation Design.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Human deleterious mutation rate slows adaptation and implies high fitness variance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.Genetics · 2025Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A Path Integral Approach for Allele Frequency Dynamics Under Polygenic Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Population genetic simulation: Benchmarking frameworks for non-standard models of natural selection.Molecular ecology resources · 2024Article
- Background Selection From Unlinked Sites Causes Nonindependent Evolution of Deleterious Mutations.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Demographic modeling of admixed Latin American populations from whole genomes.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Demographically explicit scans for barriers to gene flow using gIMble.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- The effect of mutational robustness on the evolvability of multicellular organisms and eukaryotic cells.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- SLiM 4: Multispecies Eco-Evolutionary Modeling.The American naturalist · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Demes: a standard format for demographic models.Genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
fwdpp is a C++ library of routines intended to facilitate the development of forward-time simulations under arbitrary mutation and fitness models. The library design provides a combination of speed, low memory overhead, and modeling flexibility not currently available from other forward simulation tools. The library is particularly useful when the simulation of large populations is required, as programs implemented using the library are much more efficient than other available forward simulation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.