Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24950708›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2014

Community-based implementation and effectiveness in a randomized trial of a risk reduction intervention for HIV-serodiscordant couples: study protocol.

Alison B Hamilton, Brian S Mittman, John K Williams, Honghu H Liu, Alicia M Eccles, Craig S Hutchinson, Gail E Wyatt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00644163 (NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00644163 nacompletednot on this map

NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2003 to 2007Enrolled1,070ConditionsHIV Infections, Sexually Transmitted DiseaseArmsEban HIV/STD Risk Reduction Intervention, Eban Health Promotion Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Navigating grey areas in HIV and mental health implementation science.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison B HamiltonUCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, 760 Westwood Plaza, 38-240 NPI, Box 175919, 90024-1759 Los Angeles, CA, USA. alisonh@ucla.edu.
Brian S Mittman
John K Williams
Honghu H Liu
Alicia M Eccles
Craig S Hutchinson
Gail E Wyatt

Funding

Implementing Eban II: An Evidence-Based Intervention for Sero-Discordant CouplesR01MH093230 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WYATT, GAIL E. · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe HIV/AIDS epidemic continues to disproportionately affect African American communities in the US, particularly those located in urban areas. Despite the fact that HIV is often transmitted from one sexual partner to another, most HIV prevention interventions have focused only on individuals, rather than couples. This five-year study investigates community-based implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability of 'Eban II,' an evidence-based risk reduction intervention for African-American heterosexual, serodiscordant couples. METHODS/

designThis hybrid implementation/effectiveness implementation study is guided by organizational change theory as conceptualized in the Texas Christian University Program Change Model (PCM), a model of phased organizational change from exposure to adoption, implementation, and sustainability. The primary implementation aims are to assist 10 community-based organizations (CBOs) to implement and sustain Eban II; specifically, to partner with CBOs to expose providers to the intervention; facilitate its adoption, implementation and sustainment; and to evaluate processes and determinants of implementation, effectiveness, fidelity, and sustainment. The primary effectiveness aim is to evaluate the effect of Eban II on participant (n = 200 couples) outcomes, specifically incidents of protected sex and proportion of condom use. We will also determine the cost-effectiveness of implementation, as measured by implementation costs and potential cost savings. A mixed methods evaluation will examine implementation at the agency level; staff members from the CBOs will complete baseline measures of organizational context and climate, while key stakeholders will be interviewed periodically throughout implementation. Effectiveness of Eban II will be assessed using a randomized delayed enrollment (waitlist) control design to evaluate the impact of treatment on outcomes at posttest and three-month follow-up. Multi-level hierarchical modeling with a multi-level nested structure will be used to evaluate the effects of agency- and couples-level characteristics on couples-level outcomes (e.g., condom use). DISCUSSION: This study will produce important information regarding the value of the Eban II program and a theory-guided implementation process and tools designed for use in implementing Eban II and other evidence-based programs in demographically diverse, resource-constrained treatment settings.

trial registrationNCT00644163.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanRisk Reduction BehaviorSexual PartnersAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultCommunity Health ServicesCondomsCost-Benefit AnalysisEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansInservice TrainingMaleProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID24950708
PMCPMC4085467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.