Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24949967›Full record

ArticleCell2014

Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior.

Lisa A Gunaydin, Logan Grosenick, Joel C Finkelstein, Isaac V Kauvar, Lief E Fenno, Avishek Adhikari, Stephan Lammel, Julie J Mirzabekov, Raag D Airan, Kelly A Zalocusky and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 794 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
794citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

794 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Subcortical dopamine DEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

734 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lisa A GunaydinDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Logan GrosenickDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Neuroscience Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Joel C FinkelsteinDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Isaac V KauvarDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lief E FennoDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Neuroscience Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Avishek AdhikariDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stephan LammelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Julie J MirzabekovDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Raag D AiranDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kelly A ZalocuskyDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Neuroscience Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kay M TyeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Polina AnikeevaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Robert C MalenkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Karl DeisserothDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: deissero@stanford.edu.

Funding

CLARITY: fully-assembled biologyR01MH099647 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2012 to 2016
$23.0M
Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
OPTICAL NEUROMODULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR LONG TIMESCALESR01MH086373 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2010 to 2025
$9.1M
Structural and molecular identification of circuitry underlying joint processing of motivation and aversionR37DA035377 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2013 to 2022
$6.2M
Calcium channels, newborn neurons, and CNS circuit dynamicsR01DA020794 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2005 to 2014
$4.1M
A Novel Strategy for Combating Obesity: Reprogramming Neural CircuitsDP2DK102256 · NIDDK · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI TYE, KAY MAXINE · 2013 to 2018
$2.7M
Technology development for fast optical interrogation of living neural circuitryR01MH075957 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
Dissection of the anxiety suppression circuitryR00MH106649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ADHIKARI, AVISHEK · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020794NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA035377NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interaction is a complex behavior essential for many species and is impaired in major neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacological studies have implicated certain neurotransmitter systems in social behavior, but circuit-level understanding of endogenous neural activity during social interaction is lacking. We therefore developed and applied a new methodology, termed fiber photometry, to optically record natural neural activity in genetically and connectivity-defined projections to elucidate the real-time role of specified pathways in mammalian behavior. Fiber photometry revealed that activity dynamics of a ventral tegmental area (VTA)-to-nucleus accumbens (NAc) projection could encode and predict key features of social, but not novel object, interaction. Consistent with this observation, optogenetic control of cells specifically contributing to this projection was sufficient to modulate social behavior, which was mediated by type 1 dopamine receptor signaling downstream in the NAc. Direct observation of deep projection-specific activity in this way captures a fundamental and previously inaccessible dimension of mammalian circuit dynamics.

Indexed as

Neural PathwaysSocial BehaviorAnimalsCalcium SignalingFemaleMiceNucleus AccumbensPhotometryReceptors, DopamineRewardRhodopsinVentral Tegmental AreaReceptors, DopamineRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID24949967
PMCPMC4123133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.