Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24949934›Full record

ArticleSteroids2014

The evolution of nonsteroidal antiestrogens to become selective estrogen receptor modulators.

V Craig Jordan, Russell McDaniel, Fadeke Agboke, Philipp Y Maximov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Steroids, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V Craig JordanDepartments of Oncology and Pharmacology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: vcj2@georgetown.edu.
Russell McDanielDepartments of Oncology and Pharmacology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Fadeke AgbokeDepartments of Oncology and Pharmacology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Philipp Y MaximovDepartments of Oncology and Pharmacology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Georgetown University Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1RR031975 · NCRR · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2011
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the first nonsteroidal antiestrogen ethamoxytriphetol (MER25) in 1958, opened the door to a wide range of clinical applications. However, the finding that ethamoxytriphetol was a "morning after" pill in laboratory animals, energized the pharmaceutical industry to discover more potent derivatives. In the wake of the enormous impact of the introduction of the oral contraceptive worldwide, contraceptive research was a central focus in the early 1960's. Numerous compounds were discovered e.g., clomiphene, nafoxidine, and tamoxifen, but the fact that clinical studies showed no contraceptive actions, but, in fact, induced ovulation, dampened enthusiasm for clinical development. Only clomiphene moved forward to pioneer an application to induce ovulation in subfertile women. The fact that all the compounds were antiestrogenic made an application in patients to treat estrogen responsive breast cancer, an obvious choice. However, toxicities and poor projected commercial returns severely retarded clinical development for two decades. In the 1970's a paradigm shift in the laboratory to advocate long term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for early (non-metastatic) breast cancer changed medical care and dramatically increased survivorship. Tamoxifen pioneered that paradigm shift but it became the medicine of choice in a second paradigm shift for preventing breast cancer during the 1980's and 1990's. This was not surprising as it was the only medicine available and there was laboratory and clinical evidence for the eventual success of this application. Tamoxifen is the first medicine to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of breast cancer in women at high risk. But it was the re-evaluation of the toxicology of tamoxifen in the 1980's and the finding that there was both carcinogenic potential and a significant, but small, risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women that led to a third paradigm shift to identify applications for selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulation. This idea was to establish a new group of medicines now called selective ER modulators (SERMs). Today there are 5 SERMs FDA approved (one other in Europe) for applications ranging from the reduction of breast cancer risk and osteoporosis to the reduction of menopausal hot flashes and improvements in dyspareunia and vaginal lubrication. This article charts the origins of the current path for progress in women's health with SERMs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleHumansSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenBreast cancerEndometrial cancerOsteoporosisWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID24949934
PMCPMC4192084
OpenAlexW1983191285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.