ArticlePhysiology & behavior2014
The effects of Eph-ephrin mutations on pre-pulse inhibition in mice.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell type-specific mechanism of Setd1a heterozygosity in schizophrenia pathogenesis.Science advances · 2022Article
- Jagged-2 enhances immunomodulatory activity in adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eph-ephrin signaling is known to be important in directing topographic projections in the afferent auditory pathway, including connections to various subdivisions of the inferior colliculus (IC). The acoustic startle-response (ASR) is a reliable reflexive behavioral response in mammals elicited by an unexpected intense acoustic startle-eliciting stimulus (ES). It is mediated by a sub-cortical pathway that includes the IC. The ASR amplitude can be measured with an accelerometer under the subject and can be decreased in amplitude by presenting a less intense, non-startling stimulus 5-300ms before the ES. This reflexive decrement in ASR is called pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) and indicates that the relatively soft pre-pulse was heard. PPI is a general trait among mammals. Mice have been used recently to study this response and to reveal how genetic mutations affect neural circuits and hence the ASR and PPI. In this experiment, we measured the effect of Eph-ephrin mutations using control mice (C57BL/6J), mice with compromised EphA4 signaling (EphA4(lacZ/+), EphA4(lacZ/lacZ)), and knockout ephrin-B3 mice (ephrin-B3 (+/-, -/-)). Control and EphA4(lacZ/+s)trains showed robust PPI (up to 75% decrement in ASR) to an offset of a 70dB SPL background noise at 50ms before the ES. Ephrin-B3 knockout mice and EphA4 homozygous mutants were only marginally significant in PPI (<25% decrement and <33% decrement, respectively) to the same conditions. This decrement in PPI highlights the importance of ephrin-B3 and EphA4 interactions in ordering auditory behavioral circuits. Thus, different mutations in certain members of the signaling family produce a full range of changes in PPI, from minimal to nearly maximal. This technique can be easily adapted to study other aspects of hearing in a wider range of mutations. Along with ongoing neuroanatomical studies, this allows careful quantification of how the auditory anatomical, physiological and now behavioral phenotype is affected by changes in Eph-ephrin expression and functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.