Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24949637›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Pathogenicity of Shigella in chickens.

Run Shi, Xia Yang, Lu Chen, Hong-tao Chang, Hong-ying Liu, Jun Zhao, Xin-wei Wang, Chuan-qing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Whole genome analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The journal of poultry science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of microbial diversity in the feces ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Run ShiCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xia YangCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lu ChenCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hong-tao ChangCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hong-ying LiuCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhaoCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xin-wei WangCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chuan-qing WangCollage of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Henan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shigellosis in chickens was first reported in 2004. This study aimed to determine the pathogenicity of Shigella in chickens and the possibility of cross-infection between humans and chickens. The pathogenicity of Shigella in chickens was examined via infection of three-day-old SPF chickens with Shigella strain ZD02 isolated from a human patient. The virulence and invasiveness were examined by infection of the chicken intestines and primary chicken intestinal epithelial cells. The results showed Shigella can cause death via intraperitoneal injection in SPF chickens, but only induce depression via crop injection. Immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy revealed the Shigella can invade the intestinal epithelia. Immunohistochemistry of the primary chicken intestinal epithelial cells infected with Shigella showed the bacteria were internalized into the epithelial cells. Electron microscopy also confirmed that Shigella invaded primary chicken intestinal epithelia and was encapsulated by phagosome-like membranes. Our data demonstrate that Shigella can invade primary chicken intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and chicken intestinal mucosa in vivo, resulting in pathogenicity and even death. The findings suggest Shigella isolated from human or chicken share similar pathogenicity as well as the possibility of human-poultry cross-infection, which is of public health significance.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensHeLa CellsHumansIntestinal MucosaShigellaSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsVirulence

Identifiers

PMID24949637
PMCPMC4064985
OpenAlexW2052335740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.