Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24949566›Full record

ArticleAppetite2014

Inhibitory control effects in adolescent binge eating and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and snacks.

Susan L Ames, Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya, Kim D Reynolds, Sarah Boyle, Christopher Cappelli, Matthew G Cox, Mark Dust, Jerry L Grenard, David P Mackinnon, Alan W Stacy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preschool Executive Control, Temperament, and Adolescent Dietary Behaviors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan L AmesSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA. Electronic address: susan.ames@cgu.edu.
Yasemin Kisbu-SakaryaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, 950 S. McAllister, Room 237, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Kim D ReynoldsSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
Sarah BoyleSchool of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, East 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
Christopher CappelliSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
Matthew G CoxDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, 950 S. McAllister, Room 237, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Mark DustSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
Jerry L GrenardSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
David P MackinnonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, 950 S. McAllister, Room 237, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Alan W StacySchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 675 West foothill Blvd. Suite 310, Claremont, CA 91711-3475, USA.
Claremont Graduate University · USArizona State University · US

Funding

Habitual & Neurocogonitive Processes in Adolescent Obesity PreventionU01HL097839 · NHLBI · CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY · PI REYNOLDS, KIM DANIEL · 2009 to 2014
$5.4M
Dual Processes in HIV Risk Behavior in Drug AbusersR01DA023368 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STACY, ALAN W · 2008 to 2012
$3.2M
Teenage Stimulant Use: Neurally Plausible Spontaneous and Protective ProcessesR01DA024659 · NIDA · CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY · PI STACY, ALAN W · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Decisions and Impulse Control in Nutrition BehaviorR01CA152062 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AMES, SUSAN L., BECHARA, ANTOINE · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA152062NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152062NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL097839NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL097839NIDA NIH HHS DA023368NIDA NIH HHS DA024659NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023368NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control and sensitivity to reward are relevant to the food choices individuals make frequently. An imbalance of these systems can lead to deficits in decision-making that are relevant to food ingestion. This study evaluated the relationship between dietary behaviors - binge eating and consumption of sweetened beverages and snacks - and behavioral control processes among 198 adolescents, ages 14 to 17. Neurocognitive control processes were assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a generic Go/No-Go task, and a food-specific Go/No-Go task. The food-specific version directly ties the task to food cues that trigger responses, addressing an integral link between cue-habit processes. Diet was assessed with self-administered food frequency and binge eating questionnaires. Latent variable models revealed marked gender differences. Inhibitory problems on the food-specific and generic Go/No-Go tasks were significantly correlated with binge eating only in females, whereas inhibitory problems measured with these tasks were the strongest correlates of sweet snack consumption in males. Higher BMI percentile and sedentary behavior also predicted binge eating in females and sweet snack consumption in males. Inhibitory problems on the generic Go/No-Go, poorer affective decision-making on the IGT, and sedentary behavior were associated with sweetened beverage consumption in males, but not females. The food-specific Go/No-Go was not predictive in models evaluating sweetened beverage consumption, providing some initial discriminant validity for the task, which consisted of sweet/fatty snacks as no-go signals and no sugar-sweetened beverage signals. This work extends research findings, revealing gender differences in inhibitory function relevant to behavioral control. Further, the findings contribute to research implicating the relevance of cues in habitual behaviors and their relationship to snack food consumption in an understudied population of diverse adolescents not receiving treatment for eating disorders.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentBeveragesBody Mass IndexBulimiaChoice BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesCuesEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMotor ActivitySnacksSweetening AgentsAdolescentsBinge eatingCue effectsImpulsivityInhibitory controlSweetened snacks

Identifiers

PMID24949566
PMCPMC4127340
OpenAlexW1976348468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.