ArticleBioMed research international2014
Doctors' insights into the patient perspective: a qualitative study in the field of chronic pain.
Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients' Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- "Life after treatment": what physicians consider important for oral cancer survivors' quality of life.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Practical approaches for clinicians in chronic pain management: Strategies and solutions.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2024Review
- Self-medication of adults and children in Poland - results from outpatient health care physicians online questionnaire.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Illness Perception Regarding Early-stage Mycosis Fungoides among Dermatologists: A Multi-centre Cross-sectional Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2022Article
- Advice from One Patient to Another: Qualitative Analysis of Patients' Perspectives About Chemotherapy Initiation.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Optimising prescribing practices in older adults with multimorbidity: a scoping review of guidelines.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Understanding the diagnoses and medical care experience of patients with new daily persistent headache: a qualitative study in Spain.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Comparison of learning needs priorities between healthcare providers and patients with heart failure.PloS one · 2020Article
- Exploring agendas of patients attending family medicine clinics in Jordan. A qualitative content analysis study.Saudi medical journal · 2019Article
- Meta-ethnography to understand healthcare professionals' experience of treating adults with chronic non-malignant pain.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts.BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Principles for Chronic Pain Management in the Adult Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Population at the Primary Healthcare Level, in a Developing Context: A Delphi Study.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo strengthen the conceptualization of the patient perspective by identifying aspects that, from doctors' point of view, are important to address during a consultation to build a partnership with patients.
methodSemistructured interviews were conducted with 17 doctors who are experts in the field of chronic pain in Italy. The recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and interpreted using thematic analysis.
resultsThe participants agreed about the importance of doctors addressing aspects of the patient perspective that can lead to a difference of opinion with patients, namely, patients' views about their health condition (i.e., what they think they have and why and the perceived impact of the health condition on their life) and about treatments (i.e., what they have tried or have heard about and their expectations).
conclusionsIdentifying patients' standpoints on their health condition and treatments offers an opportunity for critical discussion of differences of opinions and promotes communication exchange and agreement about the appropriate course of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.