Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24949353›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound2012

Power Doppler endoscopic ultrasound for the assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Sevastiţa Iordache, Radu Angelescu, Maria Monalisa Filip, Mădălin Ionuţ Costache, Carmen Florina Popescu, Dan-Ionuă Gheonea, Adrian Sãftoiu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sevastiţa IordacheResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Radu AngelescuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Maria Monalisa FilipResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Mădălin Ionuţ CostacheResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Carmen Florina PopescuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Dan-Ionuă GheoneaResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
Adrian SãftoiuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) represent rare, heterogeneous tumors with clinical, imaging and treatment particularities. The aim of this study was to assess the role of power Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis and characterization of PNET.

methodsAll consecutive patients with PNET assessed by power Doppler EUS in the Research Centre of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, Romania, in the past 51 months were included in the study. All EUS examinations were performed initially in gray-scale mode, followed by power Doppler mode examinations, before and after contrast-enhancement. Each recorded EUS movie was further subjected to post-processing using a computer-enhanced dynamic analysis using a special plug-in which permitted assessment of vascularity index (EUS-VI).

resultsBased on the analysis of all consecutive malignant focal pancreatic masses diagnosed in the study period, a total number of 131 consecutive patients were included: 14 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and 117 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The sensitivity of the pre-contrast EUS-VI for the diagnosis of PNET was 71.43%, similar to EUS-FNA. After contrast enhancement, the EUS-VI is also higher in PNET (27.07%) as compared to pancreatic adenocarcinoma where it was significantly lower 9.82% (P < 0.001). However, the sensitivity of EUS-VI after contrast enhancement for the diagnosis of PNET was 100%, higher than pre-contrast EUS-VI, with an acceptable specificity (79.49%) and better accuracy (81.68%).

conclusionPower Doppler EUS represents a useful method in the initial assessment of PNET. Using evaluation of vascularity through EUS-VI, the differentiation between PNET and pancreatic cancer could be possible, especially in the subgroup of patients where EUS-guided fine needle aspiration is falsely negative.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundpancreatic neuroendocrine tumorpower Doppler

Identifiers

PMID24949353
PMCPMC4062227
OpenAlexW2063483282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.