Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948810›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Multiphasic modulation of cholinergic interneurons by nigrostriatal afferents.

Christoph Straub, Nicolas X Tritsch, Nellwyn A Hagan, Chenghua Gu, Bernardo L Sabatini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. A detailed look at striatal acetylcholine, dopamine, and their interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph StraubHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Nicolas X TritschHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Nellwyn A HaganDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Chenghua GuDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Bernardo L SabatiniHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 bernardo_sabatini@hms.harvard.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Dendritic Ca signals in striatal medium spiny neuronsR01NS046579 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2004 to 2016
$5.0M
Action and interaction of ionotropic and metabotropic neurotransmissionR37NS046579 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2018 to 2024
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS046579NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046579NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS046579PHS HHS R01NSO64583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motor and learning functions of the striatum are critically dependent on synaptic transmission from midbrain dopamine neurons and striatal cholinergic interneurons (CINs). Both neural populations alter their discharge in vivo in response to salient sensory stimuli, albeit in opposite directions. Whereas midbrain dopamine neurons respond to salient stimuli with a brief burst of activity, CINs exhibit a distinct pause in firing that is often followed by a period of increased excitability. Although this "pause-rebound" sensory response requires dopaminergic signaling, the precise mechanisms underlying the modulation of CIN firing by dopaminergic afferents remain unclear. Here, we show that phasic activation of nigrostriatal afferents in a mouse striatal slice preparation is sufficient to evoke a pause-rebound response in CINs. Using a combination of optogenetic, electrophysiological, and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrate that synaptically released dopamine inhibits CINs through type 2 dopamine receptors, while another unidentified transmitter mediates the delayed excitation. These findings imply that, in addition to their direct effects on striatal projection neurons, midbrain dopamine neurons indirectly modulate striatal output by dynamically controlling cholinergic tone. In addition, our data suggest that phasic dopaminergic activity may directly participate in the characteristic pause-rebound sensory response that CINs exhibit in vivo in response to salient and conditioned stimuli.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCholinergic NeuronsCorpus StriatumFemaleGene Knock-In TechniquesInterneuronsMaleMiceMice, TransgenicSubstantia Nigraacetylcholinebasal gangliadopamine

Identifiers

PMID24948810
PMCPMC4061393
OpenAlexW1988578216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.