Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948695›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Rapid diagnostic tests to improve treatment of malaria and other febrile illnesses: patient randomised effectiveness trial in primary care clinics in Afghanistan.

Toby Leslie, Amy Mikhail, Ismail Mayan, Bonnie Cundill, Mohammed Anwar, Sayed Habib Bakhtash, Nader Mohammed, Habib Rahman, Rohullah Zekria, Christopher J M Whitty and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiology and Control of Plasmodium vivax in Afghanistan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Toby LeslieLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Health Protection and Research Organisation, Kabul, Afghanistan toby.leslie@lshtm.ac.uk.
Amy MikhailLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Health Protection and Research Organisation, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Ismail MayanHealth Protection and Research Organisation, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Bonnie CundillLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mohammed AnwarHealthNet-TPO, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Sayed Habib BakhtashMerlin, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Nader MohammedHealthNet-TPO, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Habib RahmanHealth Protection and Research Organisation, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Rohullah ZekriaHealth Protection and Research Organisation, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Christopher J M WhittyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mark RowlandLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Health Protection and Research Organisation · AFLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of rapid diagnostic tests on the diagnostic accuracy and treatment of malaria and non-severe fever in an Asian setting.

designPatient randomised trial in primary level clinics.

settingTwo areas of Afghanistan where Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum are endemic; one area with moderate transmission (eastern region) and one with low transmission (northern region).

participants5794 patients of all ages with suspected malaria enrolled by 80 clinicians in 22 clinics.

interventionsMalaria rapid diagnostic tests were compared with clinical diagnosis where no parasite diagnostic test was available, longer established field microscopy, and recently introduced microscopy.

main outcome measuresProportion of patients appropriately treated with an antimalarial, defined as patients with P vivax who received chloroquine, patients with P falciparum who received artemisinin based combination therapy, and patients with no malaria parasites who did not receive an antimalarial. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic test accuracy and the proportion of patients negative for malaria who received antibiotics and antimalarials.

resultsIn the low transmission area, comparing rapid diagnostic tests with clinical diagnosis, 65% (212/325) versus 12% (40/321) of febrile patients were appropriately treated for malaria (adjusted odds ratio 92.7, 95% confidence interval 12.4 to 694.1, P<0.001). The proportion of patients who were negative for malaria and received an antibiotic was 57% (185/325) in the rapid diagnostic test arm compared with 14% (46/321) in the clinical diagnosis arm (16.9, 3.8 to 75.4, P<0.001). In the comparison of rapid diagnostic test with microscopy in the moderate transmission area, 83.6% (1696/2028) versus 76.3% (1512/1983) of patients were appropriately treated for malaria (1.70, 1.30 to 2.23, P<0.001). A higher proportion of P falciparum cases received appropriate treatment with artemisinin based combination therapy when malaria was diagnosed by rapid diagnostic test (82%, 58/71 v 32%, 24/76; 9.2, 3.88 to 21.66, P<0.001).

conclusionsIn South and central Asian regions of low to moderate malaria transmission where clinics lack capacity for diagnosis with rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy, the introduction of the tests should be considered to improve clinical care, reduce the overuse of antimalarials, and improve disease surveillance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfghanistanAgedAmbulatory CareAntimalarialsChildChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleFeverHumansInfantMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID24948695
PMCPMC4064827
OpenAlexW2081670311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.