Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948529›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2014

Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Carla L Storr, Flora Or, William W Eaton, Nicholas Ialongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Disability inclusion in precision medicine research: a first national survey.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  3. Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  7. A Web-Based Platform for Educating Researchers About Bioethics and Biobanking.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carla L StorrDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 655 West Lombard Street Rm 645C, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA, cstor002@son.umaryland.edu.
Flora Or
William W Eaton
Nicholas Ialongo

Funding

TRANSITIONS INTO ADULTHOOD--THE BALTIMORE STUDYR01DA009897 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EATON, WILLIAM W · 1997 to 2011
$4.4M
PERIODIC OUTCOME OF TWO PREVENTIVE TRIALSR01MH042968 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KELLAM, SHEPPARD G · 1989 to 2004
$2.3M
The Center for the Study and Prevention of Drug UseR24DA019805 · NIDA · MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WAGNER, FERNANDO ANTONIO · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
Drug Dependence Epidemiology and EnviromicsK05DA015799 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
Early antecedents of posttraumatic stress disorderR01MH071395 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRESLAU, NAOMI · 2004 to 2007
$770k
ETIOLOGY &PREVENTION OF DRUG-RELATED BEHAVIORR01DA004392 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES C · 1987 to 1994
–
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015799NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004392NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009897NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA019805NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH042968NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opposed to large nationally sponsored health initiatives or biobanks, little is known about gathering genetic samples from young adults participating in academic community-based epidemiologic studies of mental health and substance use, especially samples with a large number of minority participants. This study describes our experience of establishing a genetic arm within a longitudinal study of a cohort of young adults (mean age 29, 75 % African American, 58 % female). In total, 75 % of those interviewed in the most recent wave donated a DNA sample (31.6 % blood and 68.4 % saliva) and over 90 % provided consent for storage and sharing. Current smokers were more likely to donate a sample than nonsmokers (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.14, 2.22). The odds of obtaining a saliva sample were increased for those who were former cannabis smokers and who drank more regularly, but decreased among participants with less education and a history with drug use. Fewer minorities (aOR = 0.37, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.75; p = 0.006) and cannabis users (aOR = 0.46, 95 % CI = 0.27, 0.77) consented to sharing their sample with other investigators. Findings also illustrate there are many study parameters that are important in planning biologic collection efforts. Building strong rapport and trust with subjects, minimizing the burden involved by the respondent to obtain a biological sample, offering a choice to provide blood or saliva, and offering an incentive will increase the likelihood of obtaining a sample and, importantly, increase the opportunity to store and share the sample for the future.

Identifiers

PMID24948529
PMCPMC4159479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.