Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948508›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Patients prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment: periprocedural results of the PRET randomized trial on large and recurrent aneurysms.

J Raymond, R Klink, M Chagnon, S L Barnwell, A J Evans, J Mocco, B L Hoh, A S Turk, R D Turner, H Desal and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Embolization with larger-caliber coils can increase packing density: Evidence from the pilot phase of a randomized trial.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2017
    Trial
  7. Endovascular treatment of aneurysms and platinum coil caliber: Study protocol of a randomized, controlled trial.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Comparison between second generation HydroSoft coils and bare platinum coils for the treatment of large intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

J RaymondFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Laboratory of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.R., R.K.), Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada jean.raymond@umontreal.ca.
R KlinkLaboratory of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.R., R.K.), Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
M ChagnonDépartement de mathématiques et de statistique (M.C.), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
S L BarnwellDepartment of Neurological Surgery (S.L.B.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
A J EvansDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging (A.J.E.), University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
J MoccoDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M., B.L.H.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
B L HohDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M., B.L.H.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
A S TurkDepartments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
R D TurnerDepartments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
H DesalService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (H.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
D FiorellaDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.F.), Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
S BracardDépartement de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
A WeillFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal.
F GuilbertFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal.
D RoyFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal.
PRET Collaborative Group

Funding

The Vanderbilt Stroke Trials Network Regional Coordinating Center for TennesseeU10NS086492 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FROEHLER, MICHAEL T, KIRSHNER, HOWARD STEPHEN · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Characterizing Hemodynamic Compensation and Stroke Risk in Stenosis PatientsR01NS078828 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DONAHUE, MANUS J · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078828NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSome patients with large or recurrent aneurysms may be at increased risk of recurrence postcoiling. The Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment (PRET) trial was designed to assess whether hydrogel coils were superior to platinum coils in these high-risk patients. This article reports periprocedural safety and operator-assessed angiographic results from the PRET trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsPRET was a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Patients had ≥10-mm aneurysms (PRET-1) or a major recurrence after coiling of an aneurysm of any size (PRET-2). Patients were randomly allocated to hydrogel or control arms (any platinum coil) by using concealed allocation with minimization. Assist devices could be used as clinically required. Aneurysms could be unruptured or recently ruptured. Analyses were on an intent-to-treat basis.

resultsFour hundred forty-seven patients were recruited (250 PRET-1; 197 PRET-2). Aneurysms were recently ruptured in 29% of PRET-1 and 4% of PRET-2 patients. Aneurysms were ≥10 mm in all PRET-1 and in 50% of PRET-2 patients. They were wide-neck (≥4 mm) in 70% and in the posterior circulation in 24% of patients. Stents were used in 28% of patients (35% in PRET-2). Coiling was successful in 98%. Adverse events occurred in 28 patients with hydrogel and 23 with platinum coils. Mortality (n=2, unrelated to treatment) and morbidity (defined as mRS>2 at 1 month) occurred in 25 patients (5.6%; 12 hydrogel, 13 platinum), related to treatment in 10 (4 hydrogel; 6 platinum) (or 2.3% of 444 treated patients). No difference was seen between hydrogel and platinum for any of the indices used to assess safety up to at least 30 days after treatment. At 1 month, 95% of patients were home with a good outcome (mRS≤2 or unchanged). Operator-assessed angiographic outcomes were satisfactory (complete occlusion or residual neck) in 339 of 447 or 76.4% of patients, with no significant difference between groups.

conclusionsEndovascular treatment of large and recurrent aneurysms can be performed safely with platinum or hydrogel coils.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresAdultAgedAneurysm, RupturedBlood Vessel ProsthesisFemaleHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPlatinumRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePlatinum

Identifiers

PMID24948508
PMCPMC7966274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.