Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948413›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2015

The effect of perhexiline on myocardial protection during coronary artery surgery: a two-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Nigel E Drury, Neil J Howell, Melanie J Calvert, Ralf J M Weber, Eshan L Senanayake, Michael E Lewis, Jonathan A J Hyde, David H Green, Jorge G Mascaro, Ian C Wilson and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00845364 (Metabolic Support With Perhexiline to Protect Myocardium Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00845364 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Metabolic Support With Perhexiline to Protect Myocardium Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital BirminghamRan2007 to 2010Enrolled290ConditionsMyocardial Reperfusion Injury, Cardiac Output, LowArmsPerhexiline, Placebo marked PEXSIG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nigel E DruryDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Neil J HowellDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Melanie J CalvertSchool of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ralf J M WeberCentre for Systems Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eshan L SenanayakeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michael E LewisDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton.
Jonathan A J HydeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton.
David H GreenDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jorge G MascaroDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ian C WilsonDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Timothy R GrahamDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stephen J RooneyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark R ViantCentre for Systems Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nick FreemantleDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Michael P FrenneauxSchool of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Domenico PaganoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK domenico.pagano@uhb.nhs.uk.
investigators
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/06/044/20703British Heart Foundation PG/08/040/24556British Heart Foundation PG/10/036/28341British Heart Foundation PG/10/36/28341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerhexiline is thought to modulate metabolism by inhibiting mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1, reducing fatty acid uptake and increasing carbohydrate utilization. This study assessed whether preoperative perhexiline improves markers of myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery and analysed its effect on the myocardial metabolome.

methodsIn a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients at two centres were randomized to receive either oral perhexiline or placebo for at least 5 days prior to surgery. The primary outcome was a low cardiac output episode in the first 6 h. All pre-specified analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle with a statistical power of 90% to detect a relative risk of 0.5 and a conventional one-sided α-value of 0.025. A subset of pre-ischaemic left ventricular biopsies was analysed using mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.

resultsOver a 3-year period, 286 patients were randomized, received the intervention and were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of a low cardiac output episode in the perhexiline arm was 36.7% (51/139) vs 34.7% (51/147) in the control arm [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.50, P = 0.74]. Perhexiline was associated with a reduction in the cardiac index at 6 h [difference in means 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.001] and an increase in inotropic support in the first 12 h (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89, P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in myocardial injury with troponin-T or electrocardiogram, reoperation, renal dysfunction or length of stay. No difference in the preischaemic left ventricular metabolism was identified between groups on metabolomics analysis.

conclusionsPreoperative perhexiline does not improve myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary surgery and in fact reduced perioperative cardiac output, increasing the need for inotropic support. Perhexiline has no significant effect on the mass spectrometry-visible polar myocardial metabolome in vivo in humans, supporting the suggestion that it acts via a pathway that is independent of myocardial carnitine palmitoyltransferase inhibition and may explain the lack of clinical benefit observed following surgery. CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID: NCT00845364.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac OutputCardiotonic AgentsCoronary Artery BypassCoronary VesselsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMetabolomeMiddle AgedMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryPerhexilinePlacebosPostoperative ComplicationsCardiotonic AgentsPerhexilinePlacebosCardiac outputMetabolismMetabolomicsMyocardial reperfusion injuryMyocardial stunning

Identifiers

PMID24948413
PMCPMC4324609
OpenAlexW2222609843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.