Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948033›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2014

Carotid artery stenting and patient outcomes: the CABANA surveillance study.

L Nelson Hopkins, Christopher J White, Malcolm T Foster, Richard J Powell, Gerald Zemel, Juan Diaz-Cartelle

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00741091 phase4completednot on this map

A Carotid Stenting Boston Scientific Surveillance Program Carotid WALLSTENT Monorail Endoprosthesis FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Scientific CorporationRan2008 to 2010Enrolled1,097ConditionsCarotid Artery DiseaseArmsCarotid WALLSTENT Monorail Endoprosthesis, FilterWire EZ™ System™
NCT07370246 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the Carotid Artery Stenting System for Stenosis With High-risk Features for CEA: a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-group Target-value Study in China

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled212ConditionsCarotid Artery Stenosis, Carotid Artery StentingArmsCarotid artery stent system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L Nelson HopkinsUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, and Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Christopher J White
Malcolm T Foster
Richard J Powell
Gerald Zemel
Juan Diaz-Cartelle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of the prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized CABANA study was to evaluate periprocedural clinical outcomes in high surgical risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection System by a diverse group of clinicians.

backgroundThere is a need for additional evidence evaluating carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed by operators with various experience and training levels.

methodsThe study enrolled symptomatic (≥50% carotid artery stenosis) and asymptomatic (≥80% carotid stenosis) patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy. Study centers were grouped into three tiers based on previous CAS experience while individual operators were grouped by their CAS training. The primary endpoint was the 30-day composite of major adverse events [MAEs; including stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI)]. Individual event rates were evaluated across the overall study, and by center experience and physician training tier.

resultsOf 1,097 enrolled patients, 1,025 were evaluable for 30-day MAE rate. The stroke rate (3.3%) was a major contributing factor in the overall MAE rate (4.6%). Mortality was 1.3% and the MI rate was 0.5%. There was no statistically significant association between MAE rates among the center experience tiers (P = 0.61) nor among the operator training categories (P = 0.26).

conclusionsCAS with the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EZ yielded a low 30-day MAE rate that did not differ significantly across operator experience and training levels. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00741091.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplastyAsymptomatic DiseasesCarotid StenosisEmbolic Protection DevicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk Assessmentcarotid arterycarotid stenosisembolic protectionstentstroke

Identifiers

PMID24948033
PMCPMC4233992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.