Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24948005›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2014

Update on crescentic glomerulonephritis.

Carole Hénique, Christina Papista, Léa Guyonnet, Olivia Lenoir, Pierre-Louis Tharaux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Methimazole-Induced ANCA Vasculitis: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Podocyte Injury in Lupus Nephritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Basement membranes and autoimmune diseases.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carole HéniqueParis Cardiovascular Centre - PARCC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France.
Christina Papista
Léa Guyonnet
Olivia Lenoir
Pierre-Louis Tharaux
Inserm · FRParis Cardiovascular Research Center · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent years have seen a number of major progresses in the field of extracapillary glomerulonephritis. This entity is the final damage caused by unrelated immunological disorders such as immune complexes glomerular deposits or microvascular injury caused by proinflammatory cytokines, neutrophil extracellular traps (NET), and cell adhesion molecules in the context of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). This review provides a summary of recent advances in the understanding of crescentic glomerulonephritis, focusing on interplays of local immune cells and on local mediators participating to crescent formation especially in anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibody disease. The recent advances about AAV and lupus nephritis are covered by other chapters of this issue. Nevertheless, these considerations may apply to the general case of crescentic glomerulonephritis of all causes.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisCytokinesGlomerulonephritisHumansNeutrophilsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID24948005
OpenAlexW2095967508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.