Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947901›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2014

Exaggerated waiting impulsivity associated with human binge drinking, and high alcohol consumption in mice.

Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Victor Baro, Leanne Trick, Yolanda Peña-Oliver, David N Stephens, Theodora Duka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Waiting Impulsivity: The Influence of Acute Methylphenidate and Feedback.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What is the intention to move and when does it occur?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra Sanchez-RoigeSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Victor BaroSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Leanne TrickSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Yolanda Peña-OliverSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
David N StephensSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Theodora DukaSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802642Medical Research Council G100008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are well-established links between impulsivity and alcohol use in humans and animal models; however, whether exaggerated impulsivity is a premorbid risk factor or a consequence of alcohol intake remains unclear. In a first approach, human young (18-25 years) social binge and non-binge drinkers were tested for motor impulsivity and attentional abilities in a human version of the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (Sx-5CSRTT), modeled on the rodent 5CSRTT. Participants completed four variants of the Sx-5CSRT, in addition to being screened for impulsive traits (BIS-11 questionnaire) and impulsive behavior (by means of the Delay Discounting Questionnaire, Two-Choice Impulsivity Paradigm (TCIP), Stop Signal Reaction Time, and Time Estimation Task). Using a second approach, we compared one of these impulsivity measures, 5CSRTT performance, in two inbred strains of mice known to differ in alcohol intake. Compared with non-bingers (NBD; n=22), binge drinkers (BD, n=22) showed robust impairments in attention and premature responding when evaluated under increased attentional load, in addition to presenting deficits in decision making using the TCIP. The best predictors for high binge drinking score were premature responding in the Sx-5CSRTT, trait impulsivity in the BIS-11, and decision making in the TCIP. Alcohol-naïve C57BL/6J (B6) mice (alcohol preferring) were more impulsive in the 5CSRTT than DBA2/J (D2) mice (alcohol averse); the degree of impulsivity correlated with subsequent alcohol consumption. Homologous measures in animal and human studies indicate increased premature responding in young social BD and in the ethanol-preferring B6 strain of mice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBinge DrinkingChoice BehaviorHumansImpulsive BehaviorMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBANeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeSpecies SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24947901
PMCPMC4229569
OpenAlexW2085154076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.