Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947674›Full record

ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2014

Research resource: comparison of gene profiles from wild-type ERα and ERα hinge region mutants.

Katherine A Burns, Yin Li, Liwen Liu, Kenneth S Korach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. DifferentialEnvironmental health perspectives · 2018
    Article
  10. Comparing the rules of engagement of androgen and glucocorticoid receptors.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  11. Estrogen Hormone Biology.Current topics in developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine A BurnsReceptor Biology (K.A.B., Y.L., K.S.K.), Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology and Molecular Genomics Core Facility (L.L.), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Yin Li
Liwen Liu
Kenneth S Korach
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Chemical Receptor Interactions In Reproduction And Hormonal ToxicityZIAES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 2009 to 2019
$29.6M
Chemical Receptor Interactions Reproduction/HormonalZ01ES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 1985 to 2008
$5.0M
Endometriosis and Environmental Endocrine Disrupting Chemical ExposureR00ES021737 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BURNS, KATHERINE ANNE · 2015 to 2017
$737k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES070065NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES021737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We showed previously that the hinge region of estrogen receptor (ER) α is involved in mediating its actions. The hinge 1 (H1) ERα mutant has disrupted nuclear localization and has lost interaction with c-JUN, but retains estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated functions. The hinge 2 + nuclear export sequence (H2NES) ERα mutant does not maintain nuclear translocation with hormone and no longer activates ERE target genes but does retain a nongenomic, nonnuclear, rapid-action response. Herein, we used the human endometrial cancer Ishikawa stable cell lines (Ishikawa/vector, Ishikawa/wild-type [WT] ERα, Ishikawa/H1 ERα, or Ishikawa/H2NES ERα) to characterize the biological activities of these 2 ERα hinge region mutants. We confirmed by confocal microscopy increased cytoplasmic ERα in the H1 ERα cell line and full cytoplasmic ERα localization in the H2NES ERα cell line. Luciferase assays using the 3xERE reporter showed activation of H1 ERα and H2NES ERα by estradiol (E2) treatment, but using the endogenous pS2 reporter, luciferase activity was only seen with the H1 ERα cell line. Examining cell proliferation revealed that only the WT ERα and H1 ERα cell lines increased proliferation after treatment. Using microarrays, we found that WT ERα and H1 ERα cluster together, whereas vector and H2NES ERα are most similar and cluster independently of E2 treatment. These studies revealed that the nongenomic activities of ERα are unable to mediate proliferative changes or the transcriptional profile after treatment and demonstrate the importance of genomic action for ERα/E2-mediated responses with the nongenomic actions of ERα being complementary to elicit the full biological actions of ERα.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCell NucleusCell ProliferationEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaGene Expression RegulationHeLa CellsHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein TransportESR1 protein, humanEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID24947674
PMCPMC4116590
OpenAlexW2047446761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.