Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947527›Full record

ArticleArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2014

Macrophage-independent regulation of reverse cholesterol transport by liver X receptors.

Sarah R Breevoort, Jerry Angdisen, Ira G Schulman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Liver X receptors and liver physiology.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic Flexibility and Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Cells.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah R BreevoortFrom the Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Jerry AngdisenFrom the Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Ira G SchulmanFrom the Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. igs4c@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007267 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GARCIA-BLANCO, MARIANO A. · 1985 to 2024
$13.4M
Subtype Specific LXR Activity Limits AtherosclerosisR01HL096864 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SCHULMAN, IRA G · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL096864-01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096864NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe ability of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles to accept cholesterol from peripheral cells, such as lipid-laden macrophages, and to transport cholesterol to the liver for catabolism and excretion in a process termed reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is thought to underlie the beneficial cardiovascular effects of elevated HDL. The liver X receptors (LXRs; LXRα and LXRβ) regulate RCT by controlling the efflux of cholesterol from macrophages to HDL and the excretion, catabolism, and absorption of cholesterol in the liver and intestine. Importantly, treatment with LXR agonists increases RCT and decreases atherosclerosis in animal models. Nevertheless, LXRs are expressed in multiple tissues involved in RCT, and their tissue-specific contributions to RCT are still not well defined. APPROACH AND

resultsUsing tissue-specific LXR deletions together with in vitro and in vivo assays of cholesterol efflux and fecal cholesterol excretion, we demonstrate that macrophage LXR activity is neither necessary nor sufficient for LXR agonist-stimulated RCT. In contrast, the ability of LXR agonists primarily acting in the intestine to increase HDL mass and HDL function seems to underlie the ability of LXR agonists to stimulate RCT in vivo.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that activation of LXR in macrophages makes little or no contribution to LXR agonist-stimulated RCT. Unexpectedly, our studies suggest that the ability of macrophages to efflux cholesterol to HDL in vivo is not regulated by macrophage activity but is primarily determined by the quantity and functional activity of HDL.

Indexed as

Adipose Tissue, WhiteAnimalsBenzenesulfonamidesBiological TransportCell LineCholesterolCholesterol, DietaryCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLFecesFluorocarbonsHumansHydrocarbons, FluorinatedIntestinal MucosaLiverLiver X ReceptorsBenzenesulfonamidesCETP protein, humanCholesterolCholesterol, DietaryCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLFluorocarbonsHydrocarbons, FluorinatedLiver X ReceptorsNR1H3 protein, humanNr1h3 protein, mouseOrphan Nuclear ReceptorsSulfonamidesT0901317atherosclerosislipoproteins, HDLmacrophages

Identifiers

PMID24947527
PMCPMC4107336
OpenAlexW2142423308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.