Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947313›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Intra-arterial carboplatin as a salvage strategy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

David Fortin, Pierre-Aurèle Morin, Francois Belzile, David Mathieu, Francois-Michel Paré

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03672721 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study in Relapsing Glioblastoma of Intraarterial Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy Using IA Carboplatin

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2018 to 2026Enrolled35ConditionsGlioblastoma Multiforme, RelapseArmsIA Carbo+ Radiation
NCT06356883 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Phase II Study on Intraarterial Carboplatin Combined With Caelyx Compared to Intraarterial Carboplatin Combined With Etoposide Phosphate for Progressing Glioblastoma at First or Second Relapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsGlioblastoma Multiforme, RelapseArmsIA Carboplatin + IA Caelyx, IA Carboplatin + IA Etoposide Phosphate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David FortinDivision of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada, david.fortin@usherbrooke.ca.
Pierre-Aurèle Morin
Francois Belzile
David Mathieu
Francois-Michel Paré
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first-line treatment of glioblastoma typically consists of a maximal surgical resection, followed by a combination of radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide. There is however no consensus regarding optimal therapeutic approaches at relapse. The following phase II study explored the therapeutic gain obtained when exposing these patients to a combination of intra-arterially administered carboplatin and melphalan at first or second relapse as a salvage treatment in recurrent glioblastoma. Fifty-one consecutive patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were accrued and offered this treatment at first or second relapse. A Karnofsky score of ≥ 60 was required, and when appropriate, patients were first reoperated prior to accrual. Patients enrolled were treated every 4 weeks (1 cycle) for up to 12 cycles. Progression was evaluated by Macdonald criteria. Primary end point surrogates were overall survival from diagnosis and study entry. Median survival from diagnosis and study entry was 23 and 11 months, respectively. The median time to progression was 5.2 months. All patients enrolled were treated for a minimum of 2 cycles. Hematologic toxicity was manageable, with an 8 % of grade II neutropenia, 12 % of grade II thrombocytopenia and 7 % of grade III thrombocytopenia. This therapeutic strategy represents an adequate option in the second-line treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The adjunction of an osmotic permeabilization could be considered to further expand delivery, and hopefully improve survival in these patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBrainBrain NeoplasmsCarboplatinDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialKaplan-Meier EstimateKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatin

Identifiers

PMID24947313
OpenAlexW2115399844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.