Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947275›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2014

Role of β-lactamase residues in a common interface for binding the structurally unrelated inhibitory proteins BLIP and BLIP-II.

Bartlomiej G Fryszczyn, Carolyn J Adamski, Nicholas G Brown, Kacie Rice, Wanzhi Huang, Timothy Palzkill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tackling the Antibiotic Resistance Caused by Class AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Conserved proline residues prevent dimerization and aggregation in the β-lactamase BlaC.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  3. In vivo functional phenotypes from a computational epistatic model of evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bartlomiej G FryszczynDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030.
Carolyn J Adamski
Nicholas G Brown
Kacie Rice
Wanzhi Huang
Timothy Palzkill

Funding

HOUSTON AREA MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008280 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI WENSEL, THEODORE G · 1988 to 2023
$8.0M
BETA-LACTAMASE MUTATIONS IN ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCER01AI032956 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Timothy Palzkill · 1992 to 2026
$6.5M
Beta Lactamase Mutations in Antibiotic ResistanceR37AI032956 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PALZKILL, TIMOTHY · 2001 to 2010
$3.3M
Training in Biomedical Discovery from Large Scale Data SetsT90DA022885 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PALZKILL, TIMOTHY · 2006 to 2009
$635k
Beta Lactamase Mutations in Antibiotic ResistanceR56AI032956 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PALZKILL, TIMOTHY · 2016 to 2016
$394k
NIAID NIH HHS AI32956NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI032956NIDA NIH HHS 1 T90 DA022885NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The β-lactamase inhibitory proteins (BLIPs) are a model system for examining molecular recognition in protein-protein interactions. BLIP and BLIP-II are structurally unrelated proteins that bind and inhibit TEM-1 β-lactamase. Both BLIPs share a common binding interface on TEM-1 and make contacts with many of the same TEM-1 surface residues. BLIP-II, however, binds TEM-1 over 150-fold tighter than BLIP despite the fact that it has fewer contact residues and a smaller binding interface. The role of eleven TEM-1 amino acid residues that contact both BLIP and BLIP-II was examined by alanine mutagenesis and determination of the association (k on) and dissociation (k off) rate constants for binding each partner. The substitutions had little impact on association rates and resulted in a wide range of dissociation rates as previously observed for substitutions on the BLIP side of the interface. The substitutions also had less effect on binding affinity for BLIP than BLIP-II. This is consistent with the high affinity and small binding interface of the TEM-1-BLIP-II complex, which predicts per residue contributions should be higher for TEM-1 binding to BLIP-II versus BLIP. Two TEM-1 residues (E104 and M129) were found to be hotspots for binding BLIP while five (L102, Y105, P107, K111, and M129) are hotspots for binding BLIP-II with only M129 as a common hotspot for both. Thus, although the same TEM-1 surface binds to both BLIP and BLIP-II, the distribution of binding energy on the surface is different for the two target proteins, that is, different binding strategies are employed.

Indexed as

beta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesKineticsModels, MolecularMutationProtein BindingProtein Conformationbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-lactamase TEM-1antibiotic resistancebeta-lactamasebinding kineticsmolecular recognitionprotein-protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID24947275
PMCPMC4243995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.