ArticleGenome biology2014
Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of Apobec-1-mediated C-to-U RNA editing in mouse small intestine and liver.
Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging Role of Epitranscriptomics in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- APOBEC1-Dependent RNA Eiting of TNF Signaling Orchestrates Ileal Villus Morphogenesis in Pigs: Integrative Transcriptomic and Editomic Insights.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- C to U RNA editing of MFN1 is regulated by ADARB1 and associates with favourable prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- NERD-seq: a novel approach of Nanopore direct RNA sequencing that expands representation of non-coding RNAs.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Expanded palette of RNA base editors for comprehensive RBP-RNA interactome studies.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Unraveling C-to-U RNA editing events from direct RNA sequencing.RNA biology · 2024Article
- Identification of RBM46 as a novel APOBEC1 cofactor for C-to-U RNA-editing activity.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- APOBEC-1 deletion enhances cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Engineered deaminases as a key component of DNA and RNA editing tools.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Review
- Acute expression of human APOBEC3B in mice results in RNA editing and lethality.Genome biology · 2023Article
- The Profiles and Functions of RNA Editing Sites Associated with High-Altitude Adaptation in Goats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Pan-cancer investigation of C-to-U editing reveals its important role in cancer development and new targets for cancer treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Functions and consequences of AID/APOBEC-mediated DNA and RNA deamination.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- EpisomiR, a New Family of miRNAs, and Its Possible Roles in Human Diseases.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- MiREDiBase, a manually curated database of validated and putative editing events in microRNAs.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Review
- A mark of disease: how mRNA modifications shape genetic and acquired pathologies.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Review
- Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA editing encompasses a post-transcriptional process in which the genomically templated sequence is enzymatically altered and introduces a modified base into the edited transcript. Mammalian C-to-U RNA editing represents a distinct subtype of base modification, whose prototype is intestinal apolipoprotein B mRNA, mediated by the catalytic deaminase Apobec-1. However, the genome-wide identification, tissue-specificity and functional implications of Apobec-1-mediated C-to-U RNA editing remain incompletely explored.
resultsDeep sequencing, data filtering and Sanger-sequence validation of intestinal and hepatic RNA from wild-type and Apobec-1-deficient mice revealed 56 novel editing sites in 54 intestinal mRNAs and 22 novel sites in 17 liver mRNAs, all within 3' untranslated regions. Eleven of 17 liver RNAs shared editing sites with intestinal RNAs, while 6 sites are unique to liver. Changes in RNA editing lead to corresponding changes in intestinal mRNA and protein levels for 11 genes. Analysis of RNA editing in vivo following tissue-specific Apobec-1 adenoviral or transgenic Apobec-1 overexpression reveals that a subset of targets identified in wild-type mice are restored in Apobec-1-deficient mouse intestine and liver following Apobec-1 rescue. We find distinctive polysome profiles for several RNA editing targets and demonstrate novel exonic editing sites in nuclear preparations from intestine but not hepatic apolipoprotein B RNA. RNA editing is validated using cell-free extracts from wild-type but not Apobec-1-deficient mice, demonstrating that Apobec-1 is required.
conclusionsThese studies define selective, tissue-specific targets of Apobec-1-dependent RNA editing and show the functional consequences of editing are both transcript- and tissue-specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.