Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24946000›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2014

First-line bevacizumab and capecitabine-oxaliplatin in elderly patients with mCRC: GEMCAD phase II BECOX study.

J Feliu, A Salud, M J Safont, C García-Girón, J Aparicio, R Vera, O Serra, E Casado, M Jorge, P Escudero and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

J FeliuHospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
A SaludHospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
M J SafontHospital Universitario Clinico de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
C García-GirónHospital General Yagüe, 09005 Burgos, Spain.
J AparicioHospital La Fe de Valencia, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
R VeraComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
O SerraHospital de St Joan d'Espi Moises Broggi, 08970 Sant Joan Despi, Barcelona, Spain.
E CasadoHospital Infanta Sofía, 28702 Madrid, Spain.
M JorgeComplejo Hospitalario Xeral Cíes, 36204 Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain.
P EscuderoHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
C BoschHospital General de Valencia, Avenue Tres Cruces, 2, 46014 Valencia, Spain.
U BohnHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
R Pérez-CarriónHospital Quiron, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
A CarmonaHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, 30008 Murcia, Spain.
V Martínez-MarínHospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
J MaurelHospital Clinico y Provincial de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubgroup analyses of clinical studies suggest that bevacizumab plus XELOX is effective and tolerable in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The prospective BECOX study examined the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus XELOX, followed by bevacizumab plus capecitabine in elderly patients with mCRC.

methodsPatients aged ⩾70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 out of 1 and confirmed mCRC were included. Patients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg kg(-1) and oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1, plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) bid orally on days 1-14 every 21 days; oxaliplatin was discontinued after 6 cycles. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP).

resultsThe intent-to-treat population comprised 68 patients (65% male, median age 76 years). Median TTP was 11.1 months; median overall survival was 20.4 months; overall response rate was 46%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included diarrhoea (18%) and asthenia (16%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of special interest for bevacizumab included deep-vein thrombosis (6%) and pulmonary embolism (4%).

conclusionsBevacizumab plus XELOX was effective and well tolerated in elderly patients in the BECOX study. The adverse-event profile was similar to previous reports; no new safety concerns were identified. Fit elderly patients with mCRC should be considered for treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID24946000
PMCPMC4102952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.