Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24945837›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Regulatory mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication can be locally modulated at origins by nearby sequence elements.

Christopher D Richardson, Joachim J Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of Replication Origins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher D RichardsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Joachim J LiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Role of regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication in preserving genomic stabilityR01GM059704 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, JOACHIM J · 2000 to 2019
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM059704NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells must inhibit re-initiation of DNA replication at each of the thousands of origins in their genome because re-initiation can generate genomic alterations with extraordinary frequency. To minimize the probability of re-initiation from so many origins, cells use a battery of regulatory mechanisms that reduce the activity of replication initiation proteins. Given the global nature of these mechanisms, it has been presumed that all origins are inhibited identically. However, origins re-initiate with diverse efficiencies when these mechanisms are disabled, and this diversity cannot be explained by differences in the efficiency or timing of origin initiation during normal S phase replication. This observation raises the possibility of an additional layer of replication control that can differentially regulate re-initiation at distinct origins. We have identified novel genetic elements that are necessary for preferential re-initiation of two origins and sufficient to confer preferential re-initiation on heterologous origins when the control of re-initiation is partially deregulated. The elements do not enhance the S phase timing or efficiency of adjacent origins and thus are specifically acting as re-initiation promoters (RIPs). We have mapped the two RIPs to ∼ 60 bp AT rich sequences that act in a distance- and sequence-dependent manner. During the induction of re-replication, Mcm2-7 reassociates both with origins that preferentially re-initiate and origins that do not, suggesting that the RIP elements can overcome a block to re-initiation imposed after Mcm2-7 associates with origins. Our findings identify a local level of control in the block to re-initiation. This local control creates a complex genomic landscape of re-replication potential that is revealed when global mechanisms preventing re-replication are compromised. Hence, if re-replication does contribute to genomic alterations, as has been speculated for cancer cells, some regions of the genome may be more susceptible to these alterations than others.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA, FungalDNA ReplicationGenetic VariationGenome, FungalMinichromosome Maintenance ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticReplication OriginSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseCDC6 protein, S cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA, FungalMinichromosome Maintenance ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24945837
PMCPMC4063666
OpenAlexW2333878788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.