Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24944917›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism2014

Consensus statement on diabetes in children.

K M Prasanna Kumar, N Prabhu Dev, K V Raman, Rajnanda Desai, T Geetha Prasadini, A K Das, Soraya Ramoul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diabetes-friendly environments for children with diabetes.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2015
    Article
  3. Type 1 diabetes guidelines: Are they enough?Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2015
    Article
  4. Treatment essentials and training for health care providers.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2015
    Article
  5. Type 1 diabetes care updates: Tanzania.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K M Prasanna KumarConsultant Endocrinologist, Bangalore Diabetes Hospital, Vasanthnagar, Bangalore, India.
N Prabhu DevChairman, Karnataka Health Commission and Vice-Chancellor, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.
K V RamanDirector, Department of Health and Family Welfare Services, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry, India.
Rajnanda DesaiChief Medical Officer and Project Director, Goa State AIDS control society, Panaji, Goa, India.
T Geetha PrasadiniAdditional Director (DCP), State Surveillance Officer (IDSP), State Nodal Officer (NCDs), Directorate of Public Health and Family Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, India.
A K DasMedical Superintendent and Senior Professor of Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Soraya RamoulDirector, Access to Health, Changing Diabetes Partnerships, NNAS, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While T1DM has been traditionally seen as a minor concern in the larger picture of pediatric ailments, new data reveals that the incidence of T1DM has assumed alarming proportions. It has long been clear that while the disease may be diagnosed at an early age, its impact is not isolated to afflicted children. The direct impact of the disease on the patient is debilitating due to the nature of the disease and lack of proper access to treatment in India. But this impact is further compounded by the utter apathy and often times antipathy, which patients withT1DM have to face. Lack of awareness of the issue in all stakeholders, low access to quality healthcare, patient, physician, and system level barriers to the delivery of optimal diabetes care are some of the factors which hinder successful management of T1DM. The first international consensus meet on diabetes in children was convened with the aim of providing a common platform to all the stakeholders in the management of T1DM, to discuss the academic, administrative and healthcare system related issues. The ultimate aim was to articulate the problems faced by children with diabetes in a way that centralized their position and focused on creating modalities of management sensitive to their needs and aspirations. It was conceptualized to raise a strong voice of advocacy for improving the management of T1DM and ensuring that "No child should die of diabetes". The unique clinical presentations of T1DM coupled with ignorance on the part of the medical community and society in general results in outcomes that are far worse than that seen with T2DM. So there is a need to substantially improve training of HCPs at all levels on this neglected aspect of healthcare.

Indexed as

Awareness creationguidelines on insulin usepatient centric approachrole of policy makers and GovernmentType 1 Diabetes

Identifiers

PMID24944917
PMCPMC4056121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.