Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24944487›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Diabetes mellitus increases risk for colorectal adenomas in younger patients.

Hongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04477694 (The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Hemodynamics, Procedure Times, Anesthetic Consumption and Complications in Colonoscopy Under Sedoanalgesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04477694 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Hemodynamics, Procedure Times, Anesthetic Consumption and Complications in Colonoscopy Under Sedoanalgesia

TypeobservationalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, SedoanalgesiaArmscolonoscopy under sedoanalgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early-onset colorectal cancer: initial clues and current views.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Energy sensing pathways: Bridging type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer?Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongha T VuHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Nneka UfereHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Yan YanHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Jean S WangHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Dayna S EarlyHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Jill E ElwingHongha T Vu, Nneka Ufere, Yan Yan, Jean S Wang, Dayna S Early, Jill E Elwing, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Yanbian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine if diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased risk of colorectal adenomas in younger subjects.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 375 patients undergoing index colonoscopy at a single tertiary care center in the United States. Three cohorts of patients matched for exam date and gender were compared: (1) ages 40-49 years with DM; (2) ages 40-49 years without DM; and (3) ages 50-59 years without DM. Data collected included demographics, co-morbidities, colonoscopy and pathology results. Adenoma detection rates (ADR) were calculated and compared. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between each cohort and ADR.

resultsOne hundred and twenty-five patients ages 40-49 with DM met study eligibility criteria. Patients in the other two cohorts were randomly selected, matching for date of exam and gender. ADR was 14.4% in those ages 40-49 years without DM, 30.4% in those ages 40-49 years with DM, and 32.0% in those ages 50-59 years without DM. Compared to those ages 40-49 years without DM, ADR was higher in those ages 40-49 years with DM (OR = 3.1; 95%CI: 1.5-6.4; P = 0.002) and those ages 50-59 years without DM (OR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.5-5.6; P = 0.002). There was no difference between the ADR in those ages 40-49 years with DM and those ages 50-59 years without DM (P = 0.83).

conclusionDM was associated with higher risk of colorectal adenomas in patients ages 40-49 years. These subjects harbored as many adenomas as those at the standard screening age of 50-59 years without DM.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAge FactorsChi-Square DistributionColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioAdenomaColonoscopyColorectal cancerDiabetes mellitusRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID24944487
PMCPMC4051936
OpenAlexW1995987831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.