ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
182 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 398 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between dietary factors and colorectal serrated polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Observational Studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Index-based dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Impacts on Natural Killer Cells.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- Review
- Article
- DeepMetabio-mCRC Screener: A Multi-Omics Deep Learning Framework for Early Risk Prediction and Biomarker Discovery in Colorectal Liver Metastasis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Regulatory roles of non-coding and exosomal RNAs in colorectal cancer: spotlight on angiogenesis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Potential of Selected C-X-C Motif Chemokines as Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic mechanism of β-alanine metabolic pathway affecting colorectal cancer prognosis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- PRMT5 highly expressed on CD16 + CD56- natural killer cells is correlated with NK cells exhaustion in colorectal cancer mesenchyme.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Molecular characterization of colorectal cancer (CRC) using next generation sequencing (NGS) in bridging the gap between research and clinical practice: from biomarker discovery to clinical implementation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Sample size required for prognostic genes analysis in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection: An insight into colorectal cancer and FDA-approved biomarkers.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Applying Neural Networks to Analyse Inflammatory, Sociodemographic, and Psychological Factors in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer and Colon Cancer: A Statistical and Artificial Intelligence Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Decreased mitochondrial transcription factor A and mitochondrial DNA copy number promote cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A expression and reduce tumorigenic properties of colorectal cancer cells.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- The inhibitory efficacy of Ginsenoside Rg3 on proliferation and migration of colonic carcinoma cells through the JAK3/STAT5 signaling pathway.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Spatial analysis of risk factors related to colorectal cancer in Iran: An ecological study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Characterizing m6A modification factors and their interactions in colorectal cancer: implications for tumor subtypes and clinical outcomes.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- "GLI1 Subcellular Localization and Overexpression as Prognostic Factors for Disease-Free Survival in Colorectal Carcinoma".Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a very heterogeneous disease that is caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. CRC develops through a gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes, leading to the transformation of normal colonic mucosa into invasive cancer. CRC is one of the most prevalent and incident cancers worldwide, as well as one of the most deadly. Approximately 1235108 people are diagnosed annually with CRC, and 609051 die from CRC annually. The World Health Organization estimates an increase of 77% in the number of newly diagnosed cases of CRC and an increase of 80% in deaths from CRC by 2030. The incidence of CRC can benefit from different strategies depending on its stage: health promotion through health education campaigns (when the disease is not yet present), the implementation of screening programs (for detection of the disease in its early stages), and the development of nearly personalized treatments according to both patient characteristics (age, sex) and the cancer itself (gene expression). Although there are different strategies for screening and although the number of such strategies is increasing due to the potential of emerging technologies in molecular marker application, not all strategies meet the criteria required for screening tests in population programs; the three most accepted tests are the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy. FOBT is the most used method for CRC screening worldwide and is also the primary choice in most population-based screening programs in Europe. Due to its non-invasive nature and low cost, it is one of the most accepted techniques by population. CRC is a very heterogeneous disease, and with a few exceptions (APC, p53, KRAS), most of the genes involved in CRC are observed in a small percentage of cases. The design of genetic and epigenetic marker panels that are able to provide maximum coverage in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia seems a reasonable strategy. In recent years, the use of DNA, RNA and protein markers in different biological samples has been explored as strategies for CRC diagnosis. Although there is not yet sufficient evidence to recommend the analysis of biomarkers such as DNA, RNA or proteins in the blood or stool, it is likely that given the quick progression of technology tools in molecular biology, increasingly sensitive and less expensive, these tools will gradually be employed in clinical practice and will likely be developed in mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.