ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2003
Bioequivalence and tolerability study of two brands of clopidogrel tablets, using inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacodynamic measures.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Generic Medications Be a Safe and Effective Alternative to Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of metabolomics and platelet aggregometry between Plavix and generic clopidogrel in cats: a pilot study.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Comparative fasting bioavailability of two clopidogrel formulations in healthy Mediterranean volunteers: an in vitro-in vivo correlation.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of platelets in acute cardiovascular atherothrombotic events has been well established and attention has focused on platelet inhibition therapy. Clopidogrel is a novel thienopyridine inhibitor of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation. Recent studies have shown that in the setting of coronary angioplasty/stenting, a loading dose of 300 mg followed by 75 mg once daily is required for optimum benefit.
objectiveThis study assessed the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 oral formulations of clopidogrel 75-mg tablets.
methodsThis 10-day, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, comparative bioequivalence and tolerability study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (Hyderabad, India). Young healthy male volunteers were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to receive one of two 75-mg tablet formulations of clopidogrel (Clopivas(®) [test formulation] or Plavix(®) [reference formulation]). Subjects first received a 300-mg loading dose (four 75-mg tablets) on day 1, followed by 75 mg (1 tablet) at 8:00 AM daily for the next 6 days. Inhibition of platelet aggregation, which is the pharmacologic basis for the therapeutic efficacy of antiplatelet agents, and the effect on bleeding time were used as the pharmacodynamic assessment criteria. Pharmacodynamic variables included mean of maximum activity of percentage of inhibition of platelet aggregation (Emax), mean time to reach Emax (tmax), and mean area under the activity-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours (AUC0-168). Tolerability assessments included blood pressure and heart rate measurements before and at regular intervals (every hour for 12 hours and then at 24 hours) over a 24-hour period after drug administration. Clinical tolerability was assessed using adverse effects, platelet count (assessed on days 3, 6, and 10 after first-dose administration), and neutrophil count (assessed on day 10 after first-dose administration).
resultsTwenty subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 26.5 [2.9] years [range, 22-32 years]). Emax, tmax, and AUC0-168 were similar between the 2 groups, as was bleeding time. The 90% CIs were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125%. One subject (10%) in the Plavix group experienced mild headache; no serious adverse effects were reported, and none of the subjects dropped out due to an adverse effect. Platelet and neutrophil counts were found to be within normal limits.
conclusionsIn this study of healthy male volunteers, the 2 tablet preparations of clopidogrel showed bioequivalence. However, the sample size was smaller than that generally recommended for a bioequivalence study, and additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.