ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2014
Sex and basic science. A Title IX position.
Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the paradigm shift of sex inclusive preclinical research and lessons learnt.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A review of the historical use of sex as a biological variable in theAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Review
- Male bias in ACE2 basic science research: missed opportunity for discovery in the time of COVID-19.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021Review
- Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Sex as an important biological variable in biomedical research.BMB reports · 2018Review
- Recommendations concerning the new U.S. National Institutes of Health initiative to balance the sex of cells and animals in preclinical research.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2015Article
- Opinion: Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.