Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24944159›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2014

Safety of bosutinib versus imatinib in the phase 3 BELA trial in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Jorge E Cortes, Jeff H Lipton, Anna Dmoszynska, Raymond S Wong, Victor Rossiev, Dmitri Pavlov, Karin Gogat Marchant, Ladan Duvillié, Navin Khattry and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Bosutinib versus Placebo for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Carlo Gambacorti-PasseriniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Jorge E Cortes
Jeff H Lipton
Anna Dmoszynska
Raymond S Wong
Victor Rossiev
Dmitri Pavlov
Karin Gogat Marchant
Ladan Duvillié
Navin Khattry
Hagop M Kantarjian
Tim H Brümmendorf
Pfizer (France) · FRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMedical University of Lublin · PLPfizer (United States) · USPrince of Wales Hospital · CNPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASamara Regional Clinical Oncology Center · RUTata Memorial Hospital · INUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bosutinib, an orally active, Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML). This updated analysis of the BELA trial assessed the safety profile and management of toxicities of bosutinib versus imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed (≤6 months) CP CML after >30 months from accrual completion. Among patients randomized to bosutinib 500 mg/d (n = 250) or imatinib 400 mg/d (n = 252), 248 and 251, respectively, received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Adverse events (AEs; any grade) with bosutinib versus imatinib were significantly more common for certain gastrointestinal events (diarrhea, 70% vs. 26%; P < 0.001; vomiting, 33% vs. 16%; P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (33% vs. 9%; P < 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (28% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) elevations, and pyrexia (19% vs. 12%; P = 0.046). AEs significantly less common with bosutinib included edema (periorbital, 2% vs. 14%; P < 0.001; peripheral, 5% vs. 12%; P = 0.006), musculoskeletal (myalgia, 5% vs. 12%; P = 0.010; muscle cramps, 5% vs. 22%; P < 0.001; bone pain, 4% vs. 11%; P = 0.003), increased creatine phosphokinase (8% vs. 20%; P < 0.001), neutropenia (13% vs. 30%; P < 0.001), and leukopenia (9% vs. 22%; P < 0.001). Between-group differences in the incidence of cardiac and vascular AEs were not significant. Diarrhea was typically transient, mostly Grade 1/2, occurring early during treatment, and was manageable with antidiarrheal medication. Despite higher rates of aminotransferase elevation with bosutinib, events were managed in most patients with dose modification and/or concomitant medication. Bosutinib had a manageable safety profile distinct from that of imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CP CML.

Indexed as

Aniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesNitrilesPiperazinesPyrimidinesQuinolinesAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesDiarrheaFemaleFeverHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleAlanine TransaminaseAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesBenzamidesbosutinibImatinib MesylateNitrilesPiperazinesPyrimidinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID24944159
PMCPMC4305212
OpenAlexW1490900965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.