ArticleNature2014
NIH policy: mandate goes too far.
Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research.eLife · 2025Article
- The power-and complexity-of policy to drive advances in women's health.Science advances · 2025Review
- Endoluminal photodynamic therapy with a photoreactive stent-based catheter system to treat malignant colorectal obstruction.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Region-specific neuroadaptations of CRF1 and CRF2 expression following heroin exposure in female rats.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2025Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression and Response to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Sex similarities and dopaminergic differences in interval timing.Behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mutations associated with autism lead to similar synaptic and behavioral alterations in both sexes of male and female mouse brain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- On the basis of sex: male vs. female rat adenosine ABMC research notes · 2023Article
- Statistical simulations show that scientists need not increase overall sample size by default when including both sexes in in vivo studies.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in the Systemic and Local Immune Response of Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2023Article
- Sex and estrous cycle affect experience-dependent plasticity in mouse primary visual cortex.PloS one · 2023Article
- Immune Sexual Dimorphism: Connecting the Dots.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Review
- Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: emerging evidence of a biased literature.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020Review
- Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2020Review
- Short-Term Exposure to Waterpipe/Hookah Smoke Triggers a Hyperactive Platelet Activation State and Increases the Risk of Thrombogenesis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020Article
- Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo.British journal of pharmacology · 2019Review
- Correlation among the Behavioral Features in the Offspring of Morphine-Abstinent Rats.Addiction & health · 2019Article
- Sex differences in fear extinction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Review
- Transgenerational influence of parental morphine exposure on pain perception, anxiety-like behavior and passive avoidance memory among male and female offspring of Wistar rats.EXCLI journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24943947What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.