ArticleLeukemia2015
Recurrent mutations refine prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- Canadian evidence-based guideline for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Guideline
- Trial
- Trial
- Non-coding NOTCH1 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia; their clinical impact in the UK CLL4 trial.Leukemia · 2017Trial
- The Dohner fluorescence in situ hybridization prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): the CLL Research Consortium experience.British journal of haematology · 2016Trial
- Chromosome Karyotyping in Hematological Malignancies: Current Status and Future Directions.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Recurrent antibody repertoire features associated with six selected human IGHV genes: V(D)J usage, heavy-light pairing, and CDRH3 properties.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Integration of Germline and Somatic Variation Improves Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Risk Stratification.Cancer research · 2025Article
- Venetoclax-Based Regimens in CLL: Immunoglobulin G Levels, Absolute Neutrophil Counts, and Infectious Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Prognostic and predictive impact of NOTCH1 mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a tertiary single-center experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Conventional and non-conventional antigen-binding sites promote the development and function of chronic lymphocytic leukemia stereotyped subset #4 clones.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Association of Genetic Variants at theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Realizing precision medicine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Remaining challenges and potential opportunities.HemaSphere · 2024Review
- Potential New Therapies "ROS-Based" in CLL: An Innovative Paradigm in the Induction of Tumor Cell Apoptosis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- A personalized stepwise dynamic predictive algorithm of the time to first treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.iScience · 2023Article
- SF3B1 hotspot mutations confer sensitivity to PARP inhibition by eliciting a defective replication stress response.Nature genetics · 2023Article
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Through the European Research Initiative on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (ERIC), we screened 3490 patients with CLL for mutations within the NOTCH1 (n=3334), SF3B1 (n=2322), TP53 (n=2309), MYD88 (n=1080) and BIRC3 (n=919) genes, mainly at diagnosis (75%) and before treatment (>90%). BIRC3 mutations (2.5%) were associated with unmutated IGHV genes (U-CLL), del(11q) and trisomy 12, whereas MYD88 mutations (2.2%) were exclusively found among M-CLL. NOTCH1, SF3B1 and TP53 exhibited variable frequencies and were mostly enriched within clinically aggressive cases. Interestingly, as the timespan between diagnosis and mutational screening increased, so too did the incidence of SF3B1 mutations; no such increase was observed for NOTCH1 mutations. Regarding the clinical impact, NOTCH1 mutations, SF3B1 mutations and TP53 aberrations (deletion/mutation, TP53ab) correlated with shorter time-to-first-treatment (P<0.0001) in 889 treatment-naive Binet stage A cases. In multivariate analysis (n=774), SF3B1 mutations and TP53ab along with del(11q) and U-CLL, but not NOTCH1 mutations, retained independent significance. Importantly, TP53ab and SF3B1 mutations had an adverse impact even in U-CLL. In conclusion, we support the clinical relevance of novel recurrent mutations in CLL, highlighting the adverse impact of SF3B1 and TP53 mutations, even independent of IGHV mutational status, thus underscoring the need for urgent standardization/harmonization of the detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.