Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24943699›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2014

Breakthroughs in cell therapy for heart disease: focus on cardiosphere-derived cells.

Eduardo Marbán

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Stem cell therapy for muscular dystrophies.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Y RNAs: Biogenesis, Function and Implications for the Cardiovascular System.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo MarbánCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: Eduardo.Marban@csmc.edu.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Electrophysiology and Cell Biology of Cardiac Stem CellsR01HL083109 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARBAN, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2014
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical reality of cell therapy for heart disease dates back to the 1990 s, when autologous skeletal myoblasts were first transplanted into failing hearts during open-chest surgery. Since then, the focus has shifted to bone marrow-derived cells and, more recently, cells extracted from the heart itself. Although progress has been nonlinear and often disheartening, the field has nevertheless made remarkable progress. Six major breakthroughs are notable: (1) the establishment of safety with intracoronary delivery; (2) the finding that therapeutic regeneration is possible; (3) the increase in allogeneic cell therapy; (4) the effect of increasing mechanistic insights; (5) glimmers of clinical efficacy; and (6) the progression to phase 2 and 3 studies. This article individually reviews these landmark developments in detail and concludes that the field has reached a new phase of maturity where the prospect of clinical impact is increasingly imminent.

Indexed as

AlbuminsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHeart DiseasesHumansPolyestersStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTreatment OutcomeAlbuminsPB-127 compoundPolyesters

Identifiers

PMID24943699
PMCPMC4122123
OpenAlexW2020613580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.