ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Prognosis value of mitotic kinase Aurora-A for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- IncreasedJournal of Cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Others and we have demonstrated that hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and transcriptionally upregulated Aurora-A are required for disease progression in several tumors. We investigated the clinicopathological value of HIF-1α and Aurora-A in primary duodenal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated Aurora-A and HIF-1α expression semiquantitatively in 140 PDA cases. There were 76 cases from one institute that formed the training set; 64 cases from another two institutes were used as the testing set to validate the prognostic value of Aurora-A and HIF-1α expression. Aurora-A expression was high or sufficient in the tumor zone, whereas expression was low in the adjacent normal epithelia. High Aurora-A expression, identified using the training set receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis-generated cutoff score, predicted poorer overall survival both in the testing set (18.0 vs. 45.1 %, P = 0.001) and training set (23.1 vs. 53.9 %, P = 0.011). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that Aurora-A was an independent prognostic factor. Contrary to previous studies, we did not detect any correlation between Aurora-A and HIF-1α. Survival analysis showed that HIF-1α level was not correlated with patient outcome (P = 0.466). Activation of Aurora-A, an independent negative prognostic biomarker, might be used to identify particular PDA patients for more selective therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24943686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.