Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24943673›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2014

Weight loss referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary care referral to a commercial weight loss provider for 12 weeks, referral for 52 weeks, and a brief self-help intervention [ISRCTN82857232].

Amy L Ahern, Paul N Aveyard, Jason Cg Halford, Adrian Mander, Lynne Cresswell, Simon R Cohn, Marc Suhrcke, Tim Marsh, Ann M Thomson, Susan A Jebb

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Mechanisms of Action in a Behavioral Weight-Management Program: Latent Growth Curve Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Experiences of a commercial weight-loss programme after primary care referral: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lifestyle intervention for obesity: a call to transform the clinical care delivery system in Mexico.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy L AhernMRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK. Amy.Ahern@mrc-hnr.cam.ac.uk.
Paul N Aveyard
Jason Cg Halford
Adrian Mander
Lynne Cresswell
Simon R Cohn
Marc Suhrcke
Tim Marsh
Ann M Thomson
Susan A Jebb
MRC Human Nutrition Research · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUK Health Forum · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBritish Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J000493/1Medical Research Council MC_U105960389Medical Research Council MC_UP_1302/2Medical Research Council MR/J000493/1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent trials demonstrate the acceptability and short term efficacy of primary care referral to a commercial weight loss provider for weight management. Commissioners now need information on the optimal duration of intervention and the longer term outcomes and cost effectiveness of such treatment to give best value for money. METHODS/

designThis multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a parallel design will recruit 1200 overweight adults (BMI ≥28 kg/m2) through their primary care provider. They will be randomised in a 2:5:5 allocation to: Brief Intervention, Commercial Programme for 12 weeks, or Commercial Programme for 52 weeks. Participants will be followed up for two years, with assessments at 0, 3, 12 and 24 months. The sequential primary research questions are whether the CP interventions achieve significantly greater weight loss from baseline to 12 months than BI, and whether CP52 achieves significantly greater weight loss from baseline to 12 months than CP12. The primary outcomes will be an intention to treat analysis of between treatment differences in body weight at 12 months. Clinical effectiveness will be also be assessed by measures of weight, fat mass, and blood pressure at each time point and biochemical risk factors at 12 months. Self-report questionnaires will collect data on psychosocial factors associated with adherence, weight-loss and weight-loss maintenance. A within-trial and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from an NHS perspective. Qualitative methods will be used to examine the participant experience. DISCUSSION: The current trial compares the clinical and cost effectiveness of referral to a commercial provider with a brief intervention. This trial will specifically examine whether providing longer weight-loss treatment without altering content or intensity (12 months commercial referral vs. 12 weeks) leads to greater weight loss at one year and is sustained at 2 years. It will also evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of the three interventions. This study has direct implications for primary care practice in the UK and will provide important information to inform the decisions of practitioners and commissioners about service provision.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN82857232. Date registered: 15/10/2012.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdolescentAdultCommerceFemaleHumansMaleObesityOverweightResearch DesignRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24943673
PMCPMC4230033
OpenAlexW1994607813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.