Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24943368›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species' roles in plant-pollinator networks.

Matthias Albrecht, Benigno Padrón, Ignasi Bartomeus, Anna Traveset

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reproductive Ecology of the Invasive Alien ShrubPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Spatial variation in species' roles in host-helminth networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias AlbrechtLaboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global (LINC-Global), Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Miquel Marqués 21, Mallorca 07190, Balearic Islands, Spain Agroscope, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich 8046, Switzerland matthias.albrecht@agroscope.admin.ch.
Benigno PadrónLaboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global (LINC-Global), Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Miquel Marqués 21, Mallorca 07190, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Ignasi BartomeusEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.
Anna TravesetLaboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global (LINC-Global), Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Miquel Marqués 21, Mallorca 07190, Balearic Islands, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compartmentalization-the organization of ecological interaction networks into subsets of species that do not interact with other subsets (true compartments) or interact more frequently among themselves than with other species (modules)-has been identified as a key property for the functioning, stability and evolution of ecological communities. Invasions by entomophilous invasive plants may profoundly alter the way interaction networks are compartmentalized. We analysed a comprehensive dataset of 40 paired plant-pollinator networks (invaded versus uninvaded) to test this hypothesis. We show that invasive plants have higher generalization levels with respect to their pollinators than natives. The consequences for network topology are that-rather than displacing native species from the network-plant invaders attracting pollinators into invaded modules tend to play new important topological roles (i.e. network hubs, module hubs and connectors) and cause role shifts in native species, creating larger modules that are more connected among each other. While the number of true compartments was lower in invaded compared with uninvaded networks, the effect of invasion on modularity was contingent on the study system. Interestingly, the generalization level of the invasive plants partially explains this pattern, with more generalized invaders contributing to a lower modularity. Our findings indicate that the altered interaction structure of invaded networks makes them more robust against simulated random secondary species extinctions, but more vulnerable when the typically highly connected invasive plants go extinct first. The consequences and pathways by which biological invasions alter the interaction structure of plant-pollinator communities highlighted in this study may have important dynamical and functional implications, for example, by influencing multi-species reciprocal selection regimes and coevolutionary processes.

Indexed as

BiotaIntroduced SpeciesPlant DispersalPollinationAnimalsExtinction, BiologicalInsectabiological invasions of mutualistic interaction networksexotic speciesnestednesspollinationrobustnessspecialization

Identifiers

PMID24943368
PMCPMC4083793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.