Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24943360›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2014

[Driving ability with cerebral perfusion disorders].

P Marx

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P Marx-, Terrassenstr. 45, 14129, Berlin, Deutschland, peter.marx@charite.de.
Berlin Heart (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany expert testimony on driving ability requires knowledge of the corresponding legislation, the guidelines for expertises on driver aptitude and a qualification in traffic medicine. The testimony should clearly identify handicaps with regard to driving, give estimates on the risks of a sudden loss of the driving capability by stroke recurrence or epileptic seizures, and also consider personal attitudes, such as inadequate behaviour and lack of insight. Physical handicaps can often be compensated for by restraints, such as vehicle modifications and restrictions, such as daylight driving only.The testimony must also give estimates on the risks of a sudden loss of the driving capability by stroke recurrence or epileptic seizures. Two models are proposed by which an estimate of harmful traffic accidents due to stroke recurrence can be made.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAutomobile Driver ExaminationCerebrovascular DisordersDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalExpert TestimonyGermanyGovernment RegulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID24943360
OpenAlexW18564855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.