Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24943129›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial.

Shirin Kalimuddin, Rachel Phillips, Mihir Gandhi, Nurun Nisa de Souza, Jenny G H Low, Sophia Archuleta, David Lye, Thuan Tong Tan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01975662 (A Multi-centre Open Label Randomized Controlled Phase IIB Trial Comparing Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for the Treatment of MRSA Bacteremia Due to Isolates With High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01975662 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Multi-centre Open Label Randomized Controlled Phase IIB Trial Comparing Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for the Treatment of MRSA Bacteremia Due to Isolates With High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore General HospitalRan2014 to 2015Enrolled14ConditionsBacteremia Due to Staphylococcus AureusArmsDaptomycin, Vancomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shirin Kalimuddin
Rachel Phillips
Mihir Gandhi
Nurun Nisa de Souza
Jenny G H Low
Sophia Archuleta
David Lye
Thuan Tong TanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore. tan.thuan.tong@sgh.com.sg.
Singapore Clinical Research Institute · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality. METHODS/

designThe study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment.The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05. DISCUSSION: If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections.

trial registrationThe trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDaptomycinDrug Administration ScheduleHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesResearch DesignStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID24943129
PMCPMC4081513
OpenAlexW2134162460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.