ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2014
A predictive model of chronic kidney disease in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting kidney failure among CAKUT children in multicenter large-scale study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Complex Management of Bilateral Congenital Hydronephrosis in a Pediatric Patient: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors for childhood chronic kidney disease: a population-based study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- A Predictive Model of Postnatal Surgical Intervention in Children With Prenatally Detected Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Severe antenatally diagnosed renal disorders: background, prognosis and practical approach.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Review
- Predictors of Rapid Progression of Glomerular and Nonglomerular Kidney Disease in Children and Adolescents: The Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Cohort.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2015Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe antenatal detection of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) has permitted early management of these conditions. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in CAKUT. We also propose a risk score of CKD.
methodsIn this cohort study, 822 patients with prenatally detected CAKUT were followed up for a median time of 43 months. The primary outcome was CKD stage III or higher. A predictive model was developed using the Cox proportional hazards model and evaluated by using c statistics.
resultsChronic kidney disease occurred in 49 of the 822 (6 %) children with prenatally detected CAKUT. The most accurate model included bilateral hydronephrosis, oligohydramnios, estimated glomerular filtration rate and postnatal diagnosis. The accuracy of the score was 0.95 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.99] and 0.92 (95 % CI 0.86-0.95) after a follow-up of 2 and 10 years, respectively. Based on survival curves, we estimated that at 10 years of age, the probability of survival without CKD stage III was approximately 98 and 58 % for the patients assigned to the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur predictive model of CKD may contribute to an early identification of a subgroup of patients at high risk for renal impairment. It should be pointed out, however, that this model requires external validation in a different cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24942863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.