Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24942754›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2014

Performance of the standardised MedDRA® queries for case retrieval in the French spontaneous reporting database.

Hélène Géniaux, Denise Assaf, Ghada Miremont-Salamé, Bénédicte Raspaud, Amandine Gouverneur, Philip Robinson, Antoine Pariente, Francesco Salvo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hélène GéniauxUniversité de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, helene.geniaux@u-bordeaux.fr.
Denise Assaf
Ghada Miremont-Salamé
Bénédicte Raspaud
Amandine Gouverneur
Philip Robinson
Antoine Pariente
Francesco Salvo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Standardised MedDRA® Queries (SMQs) in adverse drug reaction (ADR) identification.

methodsADR cases included in the last complete year of the French Pharmacovigilance database for research were used to test four SMQs (narrow and broad): agranulocytosis, demyelination, osteonecrosis and psychosis. Reference cases were identified by free-text search and validated by two authors. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of narrow and broad searches of each SMQ were calculated and reported as proportions with 95% exact confidence interval (CI).

resultsAmong 20,830 cases reported in 2009, 337 validated cases of agranulocytosis, 17 of demyelination, 52 of osteonecrosis and 230 of psychosis were included in the reference sets. Estimations of SMQ narrow search performance were as follows: Se 62.9% (95% CI 57.5-68.1) and PPV 46.8% (95% CI 42.1-51.5) for agranulocytosis; Se 88.2% (95% CI 63.6-98.5) and PPV 34.1% (95% CI 20.5-49.9) for demyelination; Se 94.2% (95% CI 84.1-98.8) and PPV 74.2% (95% CI 62.0-84.2) for osteonecrosis; and Se 75.1% (95% CI 69.0-80.6) and PPV 87.8% (95% CI 82.3-92.0) for psychosis. Results obtained using the broad search were similar except for PPV concerning osteonecrosis (52.7% [95% CI 42.1-63.1]) and psychosis (61.4% [95% CI 55.7-66.8]). For all selected SMQs, Sp and NPV were greater than 98% for both narrow and broad searches.

conclusionHeterogeneous performance of SMQs for case retrieval was found and seems to be related to the characteristics of the condition of interest. It could therefore be expected that for other SMQs, performance may be affected in the same manner.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsFranceHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.