Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24942690›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2014

Immunity to gastrointestinal nematodes: mechanisms and myths.

Richard K Grencis, Neil E Humphreys, Allison J Bancroft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. PLGA-EncapsulatedVaccines · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard K GrencisFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neil E Humphreys
Allison J Bancroft

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 100290Wellcome Trust WT 100290MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune responses to gastrointestinal nematodes have been studied extensively for over 80 years and intensively investigated over the last 30-40 years. The use of laboratory models has led to the discovery of new mechanisms of protective immunity and made major contributions to our fundamental understanding of both innate and adaptive responses. In addition to host protection, it is clear that immunoregulatory processes are common in infected individuals and resistance often operates alongside modulation of immunity. This review aims to discuss the recent discoveries in both host protection and immunoregulation against gastrointestinal nematodes, placing the data in context of the specific life cycles imposed by the different parasites studied and the future challenges of considering the mucosal/immune axis to encompass host, parasite, and microbiome in its widest sense.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsChronic DiseaseGastrointestinal TractHumansImmunity, InnateImmunomodulationMucous MembraneNematodaNematode InfectionsT-Lymphocyte Subsetscytokinesinflammationparasitic helminth

Identifiers

PMID24942690
PMCPMC4141702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.