ArticleBMC cancer2014
18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues.
Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring extended [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- FDG PET/CT response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Reader variability and association with clinical outcome.Medicine · 2016Observational
- Interventional Molecular Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established imaging modality for a wide variety of solid malignancies. Currently, only limited data exists regarding the utility of PET/CT imaging at very extended injection-to-scan acquisition times. The current retrospective data analysis assessed the feasibility and quantification of diagnostic (18)F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals.
methods(18)F-FDG-avid lesions (not surgically manipulated or altered during (18)F-FDG-directed surgery, and visualized both on preoperative and postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging) and corresponding background tissues were assessed for (18)F-FDG accumulation on same-day preoperative and postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Multiple patient variables and (18)F-FDG-avid lesion variables were examined.
resultsFor the 32 (18)F-FDG-avid lesions making up the final (18)F-FDG-avid lesion data set (from among 7 patients), the mean injection-to-scan times of the preoperative and postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were 73 (± 3, 70-78) and 530 (± 79, 413-739) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean (18)F-FDG-avid lesion SUV(max) values were 7.7 (± 4.0, 3.6-19.5) and 11.3 (± 6.0, 4.1-29.2), respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean background SUV(max) values were 2.3 (± 0.6, 1.0-3.2) and 2.1 (± 0.6, 1.0-3.3), respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative and postoperative mean lesion-to-background SUV(max) ratios were 3.7 (± 2.3, 1.5-9.8) and 5.8 (± 3.6, 1.6-16.2), respectively, (P < 0.001).
conclusions(18)F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging can be successfully performed at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals of up to approximately 5 half-lives for (18)F-FDG while maintaining good/adequate diagnostic image quality. The resultant increase in the (18)F-FDG-avid lesion SUV(max) values, decreased background SUV(max) values, and increased lesion-to-background SUV(max) ratios seen from preoperative to postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging have great potential for allowing for the integrated, real-time use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in conjunction with (18)F-FDG-directed interventional radiology biopsy and ablation procedures and (18)F-FDG-directed surgical procedures, as well as have far-reaching impact on potentially re-shaping future thinking regarding the "most optimal" injection-to-scan acquisition time interval for all routine diagnostic (18)F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.