ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Development and psychometric evaluation of the urgency questionnaire for evaluating severity and health-related quality of life impact of urinary urgency in overactive bladder.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine.International urogynecology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of electroacupuncture versus solifenacin for moderate and severe overactive bladder: a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial study protocol.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- A meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with urinary incontinence: 'is it just part and parcel of life?'BMC urology · 2020Article
- Validation of the urgency questionnaire in Portuguese: A new instrument to assess overactive bladder syndrome.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUrinary urgency is the cardinal symptom of overactive bladder (OAB). However, there is no single instrument that assesses the context, severity, intensity, and daily life impact of urinary urgency. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the methods and results of the qualitative and quantitative research conducted to develop a new tool for this purpose, the Urgency Questionnaire (UQ).
methodsQualitative data from interviews with patients with urinary urgency were used to develop and refine the items and response options of the UQ. Three studies were used to evaluate psychometric properties: a clinical trial of tolterodine (Detrol; n = 974); a psychometric validation study (n = 163); and a test-retest validation study (n = 47). Item and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed to assess the subscale structure, and the psychometric performance of the resulting scales was evaluated.
resultsFifteen Likert-scale items and four VAS questions were retained. A four-factor solution was shown to best fit the data, with the subscales: Impact on Daily Activities, Time to Control Urgency, Nocturia, and Fear of Incontinence. All subscales and VAS items demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α 0.79-0.94), convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change. The UQ differentiated between OAB patients and controls.
conclusionThe results provide quantitative evidence that urinary urgency, as assessed by the UQ, is a pathological sensation distinctive from the normal urge to void and suggest that the UQ might be a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for evaluating the severity and HRQL impact of urinary urgency in OAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.